Calculus Two: Sequences and Series is an introduction to sequences, infinite series, convergence tests, and Taylor series. The course emphasizes not just getting answers, but asking the question "why is this true?"

Loading...

From the course by The Ohio State University

Calculus Two: Sequences and Series

984 ratings

Calculus Two: Sequences and Series is an introduction to sequences, infinite series, convergence tests, and Taylor series. The course emphasizes not just getting answers, but asking the question "why is this true?"

From the lesson

Alternating Series

In this fourth module, we consider absolute and conditional convergence, alternating series and the alternating series test, as well as the limit comparison test. In short, this module considers convergence for series with some negative and some positive terms. Up until now, we had been considering series with nonnegative terms; it is much easier to determine convergence when the terms are nonnegative so in this module, when we consider series with both negative and positive terms, there will definitely be some new complications. In a certain sense, this module is the end of "Does it converge?" In the final two modules, we consider power series and Taylor series. Those last two topics will move us away from questions of mere convergence, so if you have been eager for new material, stay tuned!

- Jim Fowler, PhDProfessor

Mathematics

Alternating series are awesome.

[SOUND].

Why do we care about alternating series?

Well, if you're trying to analyze the convergence of a

series and all of the terms in the series are non-negative,

then you can break out all your usual convergence tests, the

comparison test, the root test, the ratio test, the integral test.

What about series where not all the terms are non-negative?

So maybe I'm trying to analyze a series where this doesn't happen.

It's not

the case that all the terms are non-negative, but I've

got some positive terms and some negative terms in my series.

Well then what am I supposed to do?

Well one thing I could do in this case is instead

of analyzing this series directly I could look at this series.

The sum n goes from one to infinity of the absolute values of a's of n.

Try to show that this series converges absolutely.

And therefore,

this series would converge.

And what about series that don't converge absolutely?

Let's suppose I analyze this series, the sum, little n goes from

one to infinity, negative one to the n plus one, divided by n.

Now my first inclination would be to take a look at this series, the sum of the

absolute values of these terms, with the hopes that

I maybe could prove that this thing converges absolutely.

But that's not true.

This series doesn't converge absolutely, because this series diverges.

What is the absolute value of negative one to the n plus one over n?

This. It's just 1 over n.

This the harmonic series, the harmonic series

diverges so this series does not converge absolutely.

So we've gotta do something else.

And indeed, the ultimate in series tests comes to save the day.

I'll rewrite this series like this, as the sum

n goes to infinity of negative 1 to the n plus

1 times a sub n Where a-sub-n is 1 over n.

And now what I note is that the sequence a-sub-n is a decreasing sequence

all of the terms of that sequence are positive, and the limit of a-sub-n is 0.

Just the limit of 1 over n as it approaches infinity is 0 And

that means, by the alternating series test,

the series that I'm studying here converges.

Now I've just shown that it doesn't converge absolutely,

so what the opening series test is actually showing.

Is it this series converges conditionally.

This is partly why alternating series are so important.

Because of the alternating series test, we can

prove that an alternating series converges without using our other conversions tests

on the series of the absolute values, without proving absolute conversions.

We don't honestly have that many other tools for showing that a series, some

of whose terms are positive, some of whose terms are negative, converges at all.

Normally the way we'd approach those is by showing that they converge absolutely.

So what are we supposed

to do about those series which don't converge absolutely but do converge?

What can we do about the conditionally convergent series in our world?

Well, the alternating series test is a great tool in our toolbox.

And the alternating series test gives us more than just convergence.

Suppose I want to approximate the value of this series.

What could I do?

It's an alternating series, so I know that the even partial

sums in this case will be underestimates of

the odd partial sums that will be overestimates.

So, here is one of those odd partial sums, the sum of the first 3 terms.

1 over 1, minus 1 over 2, plus 1 over 3.

That's an overestimate, the true value of this series.

And here's an even partial sum, sum of the first four terms.

And that's an underestimate, the true value of this series.

And then I could actually figure out what these are, right?

1 minus a half is a half plus a third. that's 5 6ths.

And here I've got 5 6ths minus a quarter. That's 7 12ths.

So I know that 7 12ths is less than or equal to the

true value of the series, is less than or equal to 5 6ths.

Let me rewrite five sixths.

Alright I could call five sixths, ten twelfths.

It makes it a little bit clearer. I think that it's

[LAUGH]

actually bigger than seven twelfths. Now it turns out that this series is value

is actually log 2. So what I've done here is shown that log

2. Is between 7 12ths and 10 12ths, right?

What I've really done is I've shown this. Alright.

I've got this inequality now but this is just coming

because I've expressed log 2 as the value of an alternating

series, and alternating series provide these

very convenient error bounds on my estimates.

I could multiply everything here by 12 and that would tell

me that 7 is less than or equal to 12 times

log 2 which by properties of log rhythms is log of

2 to the 12th and that's less than or equal to 10.

And then I

could e to the all three of these things, right.

I could apply the exponential function to all three of these things,

and I'd find out that e to the 7th is less than

or equal to 2 to the 12th as e to the log

undoes the log, is less than or equal to e to the 10th.

And 2 to the 12th is 4096, so what I've shown just by playing

around with alternating series is this. That 4096

is between these two numbers, and I mean this isn't great, I mean these bounds

aren't fantastic, I mean I didn't add up very many terms in this series, right?

But still, I think it demonstrates the principle that one of the coolest

things about alternating series is that alternating series provide these

convenient bounds for you.

[NOISE]

Coursera provides universal access to the world’s best education,
partnering with top universities and organizations to offer courses online.