Chevron Left
返回到 Collaborative Robot Safety: Design & Deployment

学生对 纽约州立大学布法罗分校 提供的 Collaborative Robot Safety: Design & Deployment 的评价和反馈

4.7
113 个评分
39 条评论

课程概述

As robots evolve and increasingly interact with humans, enhancing the safety of personnel working with these “collaborative robots” (cobots) is vital. This course equips you to assess the safety of a collaborative robot workcell and prevent the chances of injury or harm. It imparts industry-endorsed safety standards, technical report recommendations and best practices from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Robotic Industries Association (RIA) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Learners are introduced to similarities and differences between traditional robots, cobots and conventional machinery before delving into risk assessments, causes of robot accidents and collaborative applications. Material also includes key design techniques for reducing collision forces and a methodology for safety testing. Main concepts are delivered through videos, demos and hands-on exercises. To learn more, please watch the overview video by copying and pasting the following link into your web browser: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-NU710WjM0....

热门审阅

VP

Jun 12, 2020

It was an excellent knowledge gathering exercise. The course was well structured and there is good level of guidance for learning and implementation in the course.

MV

Aug 05, 2020

learned so much about different types of robots from this course which will help me in my graduation in btech mechanical....thank you so much

筛选依据:

26 - Collaborative Robot Safety: Design & Deployment 的 39 个评论(共 39 个)

创建者 HANUMANTE J

Jun 01, 2020

Good

创建者 Patrick B

Mar 31, 2019

This was an interesting and engaging opportunity to learn about the safety standards and practices for cobot design, implementation and operation. During the course, I noticed quite a few mistakes (numerical and inconsistencies between respective questions and answers). If interested, I would be happy to point out these mistakes for your team via email. Feel free to contact me at pbarnes880@gmail.com in the case that you do not already have someone actively revising those mistakes.

创建者 Carlos E

Feb 25, 2020

Great course! My only complain is that some of the extra videos and material make no sense or the links are broken. I would have liked to have a few practical examples explained about workcell design rather than papers as extra material.

创建者 NALAM M S

Nov 25, 2019

This course is quite good but only thing I felt uncomfortable is about standards taught as they are very tidious to remember

创建者 Gabriel F

Oct 01, 2019

Very good information, tests were not proofread, but everything else was very helpful.

创建者 David M

Aug 09, 2019

This course provides an excellent presentation of useful information and methods.

创建者 Kedar P

May 03, 2020

Please Provide more Visual notes and points like a slide show while speaking.

创建者 Muslim A

Jun 24, 2020

Great Course and meet industry standards

创建者 chanakya j

May 27, 2020

very good and useful content

创建者 Siddharth M

Apr 29, 2020

good course

创建者 CHANDRASHEKAR G V

May 07, 2020

GOOD

创建者 Donald W

May 01, 2020

This is an interesting, informative course on a very specific subject. It gives a very good overview of the use of robots which interact in the same areas as people. However, the course appears to be orphaned. The forums point out a few dead links and exam question errors, but no one from the course has responded in over a year.

创建者 Ankit S

May 30, 2020

The course was okay.

The instructor was good.

though, i expected to learn some programming for safety parameters which were not at all covered in this course. This is an improvement that i would suggest.

创建者 Jessica N

Feb 17, 2020

The transcripts for the videos are clearly not reviewed and include word substitution errors that could possibly be made by software or by someone who has English as a second language and erroneously selected a similar-sounding word. In some cases, you can figure out what is trying to be conveyed, but in other cases it's pretty confusing. Some of the additional resources are just advertisements from companies trying to sell their robots. Some of the additional resources links don't work. Some of the questions in the quizzes make no sense, partly because of incorrect word substitutions. Other issues include a yes/no question in week 4 where the "yes" answer and the "no" answer each provided an explanation after either the yes or the no... but the yes and the no were attached to the wrong explanations, thus causing the answers to be illogical and false. Another question asks about an arm being pinned by a robot, but the answer it wants is the answer for the user's palm being pinned. The palm is mentioned in the question, but the arm is the part the question says is pinned- so the answer the test wants is not the answer the question asks. The video in week 4 is terrible, and doesn't really effectively answer the question associated with it.