Nov 22, 2019
The course was simple and crisp yet covered it all - interaction, visual and usability. Liked the duration of the videos followed by reading material that covered the highlights of the topic.
Mar 17, 2016
The basic principles of design and their philosophies were covered well in this course, and it was taught in a quick, efficient manner. I liked undergoing this course and would recommend it.
Jun 13, 2017
A very good learning course. The content could be more in depth to get a better understanding.
创建者 Walter L•
Apr 04, 2016
The first assignment was very confusing in terms of what was required, and it should be fixed.
创建者 Abdulelah S•
Mar 17, 2016
Everything is great apart of the third week assignment. I guess it needs to be changed.
创建者 Manny O•
Sep 24, 2016
Gave basic introduction to design principles but the assignments were very engaging
创建者 Leah N•
Jan 16, 2018
The course overall was good but the assignment instructions were not clear enough
创建者 Joel W•
Jan 06, 2016
very good course! the final was much more logical than the first course
创建者 Darren G•
May 16, 2016
This course really helped me understand what to ask of my Design team!
创建者 Jacob T K•
Jan 15, 2016
Lectures are clear and extensively cited; assignments are interesting.
创建者 Ahasanul B H•
Sep 17, 2019
Informative course..Thank you professor and coursera.
创建者 Alexander S•
Sep 28, 2015
Good explanation of few design ideas and technics.
创建者 Dave G•
Jan 26, 2016
Another very good class in this specialization.
创建者 Cibele B d C•
Sep 10, 2015
Really good introduction to interactive design
Apr 26, 2016
good tips for testing experiments
创建者 Shriman G•
Jul 30, 2020
Very interesting course
创建者 Jiahui S•
Jul 31, 2016
创建者 Miguel C•
Aug 19, 2015
I like it!
创建者 Jaime F V•
Aug 30, 2016
This course as much content in it and it's difficult to have an holistic idea how it all fits together. Some videos are taught having the same problem like, for example, some tools/themes are presented without us knowing what they are for. E.g., Chi-squared test and null hypothesis. Only after a while we understand their use. This bring a lot of overhead to us who are learning.
Some videos seem to have been re-worked over time and present cuts or jumps.
As for assignments, they should be better worked because some questions are not clear or misleading regarding the criteria that you want to evaluate.
For example, I already reported that in Question 2. and 3. of the assignment for the 3rd week. The example you give is a short introduction with two problems: 1) "I did the website", which can make the participant not to be at ease to criticize and 2) we're no evaluating the participant performance but the website. Next, you ask us to rewrite the introduction, which we do with those two problems in mind. Now, when we do the peer review we realize that you're expecting for us to rate the new introduction based on having "early prototype" and "user feedback". The original problems just seem not to count. Only by chance you can eventually write the new introduction touching the points that count for grading.
创建者 Gioconda B•
Oct 16, 2017
I like the content of the course. I feel I have learned a lot, especially working with the Chi Squared test. However, there was an example that was not clear on week 3 – Comparing rates. The example refers to comparing two buttons in a home page in order to improve traffic. The data provided was confusing because the Instructor refers that 118 people sign up the “learn more” button over a week. He calculates the chi squared value with 118 sign-ups for the “learn more” button. Then he said that 119 people sign up over a week for the same button, and he calculates the chi square value with this data. My suggestion is to review that video. Thank you.
创建者 Panagiotis P•
Feb 15, 2016
Definitely improved from the first course of this specification. Better feedback on errors regarding quizzes' questions and still really interesting assignments for peer review that help you to learn. Still missing a document or a file with all the notes that one can take away and use as a reference guide, hence only 3/5.
创建者 Olga P•
May 08, 2016
It was a good course overall, but some of the material was very complex and would require more than 3 weeks of study. I am not sure whether it will be useful in a real life, especially calculating Chi-squared and such. I also wish the professor would simplify the language in which he speaks in the lectures.
创建者 Ronald F•
May 11, 2020
Important information presented in this course. My only feedback is that a little more background or a bit more explanation on the concepts of chi square, p-value and meaning of these should have been presented. These subjects felt rushed and not well presented.
创建者 Jon M•
Aug 11, 2017
The visual design teachings could have a few more exercises that teach color choice and more details about typography styles. For example, emotions can be communicated with colors ...
创建者 Jennifer B•
Jun 19, 2018
It started off very interesting. Then it kind of fell apart during the chi-sqaure part. Some of the examples feel a bit dated and could use a bit more modern design.
创建者 Adriana C•
Mar 01, 2016
I didn't like the way contents were organized. It was too much information in a very short time.
创建者 Jerod G•
Jul 22, 2016
Several errors in lecture and lack-luster assignments decreased my perception of value.