May 31, 2019
The assessments were excellent. Initially, I did have hesitation in getting started, but got hooked to the assessments. Thank you to Kavya and Steve, our Program Managers who encouraged us everyday.
Apr 23, 2019
complete view of the businesses related to each type, separated into different sections, but with a clear explanations that the different types are interlinked into a bigger picture
创建者 Abhiram P•
Feb 03, 2019
The course started of really well with first two weeks material and videos which are engaging and interesting.
However, the latter part of the course is more of reading material than videos and hardly there is any explanation. The quality of material and the quizzes in week 4 and week 3 is relatively poor.
创建者 Espen L•
Dec 21, 2019
Interesting topic, and some of the supporting litterature is great. However, some of the articles are pretty old, like 2015, and a lot has happened the last 5 years. I had to disagree with the last test, a couple of questions not aligned with the material. Except from that, it was a great walkthrough.
创建者 Ragnar L•
May 21, 2018
It essentially is a good course, quite informative to be honest. But for a person who is working in the industry it still remains outdated and not in-depth enough. The questions on the otherhand are more focused on mentioned details in the video lecturers, rather than being able to think and evaluate.
创建者 Laurent C S•
Aug 21, 2018
It's a basic course which gives you a good overview. I like the course but the quiz are really annoying. Too many checkboxes and very confusing (e.g. has crownfunding being historically used for a funeral ?); too many mandatory lectures on wikipedia / youtube / external website
创建者 Deleted A•
Mar 26, 2020
in general terms the course is good, its teachers and didactic material, but this course presents several outdated material links, too outdated article readings, I found several from 2013 backwards.
Please review this for future students.
创建者 Beat S•
Nov 12, 2018
Some links did not work ore have been outdated.
One test was not possible to fulfill with the Chrome browser, same answers in an onother browser have been correct!
Weekly final test often not corresponding with the lecture
创建者 Angela C•
Oct 15, 2018
The content was interesting and informative, except for the Open Banking Project site where the links no longer work (404 error), but the quizzes are awful. I would not recommend this course to others.
创建者 Sridhar T•
Jul 10, 2018
There is not much original content from the school. It only used internet based references. Any material from the school's own research department would be much more helpful
创建者 Tor H•
Feb 14, 2018
Found the questions slightly basic, and some are less relevant as they only check if you have paid attention and not really check your understanding
创建者 Neeraj B•
Sep 04, 2018
While the course content is good, some videos end abruptly. Plus there is less teaching and more stuff to read from the internet
创建者 David G H•
Aug 20, 2018
Just scratch the surface. In many cases, the articles selected are just opinions and not fact/research based.
创建者 Rakibul H•
Oct 11, 2018
The course is good but quite backdated for me. Some of the links doesn't work. This course need to updated.
创建者 Lewis D•
May 13, 2019
Some of the material and videos linked to as part of the course were not of a high 'academic' standard.
创建者 Andrea G•
Sep 06, 2019
I like it but: some links are not working. too many reading and too little lesson.
创建者 Suresh R•
Feb 16, 2018
Lectures are good however would have enjoyed more with a better acce
创建者 Yash A•
Jul 23, 2018
Assignment 4 was not at all upto the mark.
创建者 Tomas M•
Nov 16, 2017
Good base ground. Need fintech updates
创建者 Daniel N•
Jan 24, 2020
Some links for reading didnt work
Sep 17, 2018
too much of text reading
创建者 Christian L•
Nov 21, 2017
The content was okay, but there were several points, I did not like about the course. As a summary, much less professional than other courses.
1) There were many references to public sources like youtube or wikipedia - the reason for subscribing here is just to learn more than from these public sources.
2) In the video, there not much good visualisation to support the presentation (e.g. no or small graphics)
3) The editing of the videos is not always good, a couple of times, the video is just cut off in the end.
4) The Danish professor was not always easy to unterstand.
5) In the quizzes, it was not always clear how to answer (e.g. the answer consisted of three words which had to be given separated by comma, but there was no hint how to do it, so you had to try & error)
创建者 Karol S•
Nov 20, 2018
Some of the parts were not basic but kindergarten level. The lecturer is getting worse in speaking in english each course. The test are sometimes prepared wrong. When answering question the way it should be it sometimes shows mistake, even if it is not - simply the lecturer did not mentioned it in the video.
创建者 Katja T•
Sep 09, 2019
Content and links partly not up to date. Little to no support from the mentors in the discussion forums. Had to wait quite some time to get my peer-to-peer review so that I could not finish the course on my on schedule which is frustrating as it is a monthly subscription.
创建者 Zivile M•
Jul 03, 2019
The presenter is very difficult to understand and the quizzes are absolutely rubbish: they are full of typos and poor grammar, and the questions and answers themselves are not well thought out at all.
创建者 Vikram M•
Jan 24, 2020
Very high level information. Mostly refers to Wikipedia articles or magazine articles, that too outdated articles published 3-4 years back. Very little original course content.
创建者 Francisco A•
Dec 26, 2019
Really poor. Explains extremmely basic concepts and abuse in the using of web URLs (lot of them were down). Don't recommend.