关于此课程： This course is an introduction into formal concept analysis (FCA), a mathematical theory oriented at applications in knowledge representation, knowledge acquisition, data analysis and visualization. It provides tools for understanding the data by representing it as a hierarchy of concepts or, more exactly, a concept lattice. FCA can help in processing a wide class of data types providing a framework in which various data analysis and knowledge acquisition techniques can be formulated. In this course, we focus on some of these techniques, as well as cover the theoretical foundations and algorithmic issues of FCA. Upon completion of the course, the students will be able to use the mathematical techniques and computational tools of formal concept analysis in their own research projects involving data processing. Among other things, the students will learn about FCA-based approaches to clustering and dependency mining. The course is self-contained, although basic knowledge of elementary set theory, propositional logic, and probability theory would help. End-of-the-week quizzes include easy questions aimed at checking basic understanding of the topic, as well as more advanced problems that may require some effort to be solved.
此课程适用人群： This course will be interesting for: • Bachelor students (3rd or 4th year) • Master students • Researchers and data analysts who want to get acquainted with formal concept analysis and its potential applications
制作方： National Research University Higher School of Economics
教学方： Sergei Obiedkov , Associate Professor
Faculty of computer science
| 级别 | 中级 |
| 承诺学习时间 | 6 weeks, 4-6 hours per week |
| 语言 | English |
| 如何通过 | 通过所有计分作业以完成课程。 |
| 用户评分 |
授课大纲
第 1 周
Formal concept analysis in a nutshell
This week we will learn the basic notions of formal concept analysis (FCA). We'll talk about some of its typical applications, such as conceptual clustering and search for implicational dependencies in data. We'll see a few examples of concept lattices and learn how to interpret them. The simplest data structure in formal concept analysis is the formal context. It is used to describe objects in terms of attributes they have. Derivation operators in a formal context link together object and attribute subsets; they are used to define formal concepts. They also give rise to closure operators, and we'll talk about what these are, too. We'll have a look at software called Concept Explorer, which is good for basic processing of formal contexts. We'll also talk a little bit about many-valued contexts, where attributes may have many values. Conceptual scaling is used to transform many-valued contexts into "standard", one-valued, formal contexts.
14 个视频, 1 个阅读材料
- 视频: What is formal concept analysis?
- 视频: Understanding the concept lattice diagram
- 视频: Reading concepts from the lattice diagram
- 视频: Reading implications from the lattice diagram
- Reading: Further reading
- 视频: Conceptual clustering
- 视频: Formal contexts and derivation operators
- 视频: Formal concepts
- 视频: Closure operators
- 视频: Closure systems
- 视频: Software: Concept Explorer
- 视频: Many-valued contexts
- 视频: Conceptual scaling schemas
- 视频: Scaling ordinal data
已评分: Reading concept lattice diagrams
已评分: Formal concepts and closure operators
第 2 周
Concept lattices and their line diagrams
This week we'll talk about some mathematical properties of concepts. We'll define a partial order on formal concepts, that of "being less general". Ordered in this way, the concepts of a formal concept constitute a special mathematical structure, a complete lattice. We'll learn what these are, and we'll see, through the basic theorem on concept lattices, that any complete lattice can, in a certain sense, be modelled by a formal context. We'll also discuss how a formal context can be simplified without loosing the structure of its concept lattice.
8 个视频
- 视频: Supremum and infimum
- 视频: Lattices
- 视频: The basic theorem (I)
- 视频: The basic theorem (II)
- 视频: Line diagrams
- 视频: Context clarification and reduction
- 视频: Context reduction: an example
已评分: Supremum and infimum
已评分: Lattices and complete lattices
已评分: Clarification and reduction
第 3 周
Constructing concept lattices
We will consider a few algorithms that build the concept lattice of a formal context: a couple of naive approaches, which are easy to use if one wants to build the concept lattice of a small context; a more sophisticated approach, which enumerates concepts in a specific order; and an incremental strategy, which can be used to update the concept lattice when a new object is added to the context. We will also give a formal definition of implications, and we'll see how an implication can logically follow from a set of other implications.
13 个视频
- 视频: Drawing a concept lattice diagram
- 视频: A naive algorithm for enumerating closed sets
- 视频: Representing sets by bit vectors
- 视频: Closures in lectic order
- 视频: Next Closure through an example
- 视频: The complexity of the algorithm
- 视频: Basic incremental strategy
- 视频: An example
- 视频: The definition of implications
- 视频: Examples of attribute implications
- 视频: Implication inference
- 视频: Computing the closure under implications
已评分: Transposed context
已评分: Closures in lectic order
已评分: Implications
第 4 周
Implications
This week we'll continue talking about implications. We'll see that implication sets can be redundant, and we'll learn to summarise all valid implications of a formal context by its canonical (Duquenne–Guigues) basis. We'll study one concrete algorithm that computes the canonical basis, which turns out to be a modification of the Next Closure algorithm from the previous week. We'll also talk about what is known in database theory as functional dependencies, and we'll show how they are related to implications.
9 个视频
- 视频: Pseudo-closed sets and canonical basis
- 视频: Preclosed sets
- 视频: Preclosure operator
- 视频: Computing the canonical basis
- 视频: An example
- 视频: Complexity issues
- 视频: Functional dependencies
- 视频: Translation between functional dependencies and implications
已评分: Implications and pseudo-intents
已评分: Canonical basis
已评分: Functional dependencies
第 5 周
Interactive algorithms for learning implications
What if we don't have a direct access to a formal context, but still want to compute its concept lattice and its implicational theory? This can be done if there is a domain expert (or an oracle) willing to answer our queries about the domain. We'll study an approach known as learning with queries that addresses this setting. We'll get to know a few standard types of queries, and we'll see how an implication set can be learnt in time polynomial of its size with so called membership and equivalence queries. We'll then introduce attribute exploration, a method from formal concept analysis, which may require exponential time, but which uses different queries, more suitable for building implicational theories and representative samples of subject domains.
14 个视频
- 视频: Learning binary patterns
- 视频: An easy case
- 视频: The general case
- 视频: Learning implications with queries
- 视频: Membership and equivalence queries for implications
- 视频: A polynomial-time algorithm
- 视频: Learning domain implications with queries
- 视频: Attribute exploration algorithm
- 视频: Attribute exploration of pairs of squares
- 视频: Object exploration
- 视频: Variations of attribute exploration
- 视频: Incompletely specified examples
- 视频: Completing incomplete contexts
已评分: Learning with queries
已评分: Learning implications with membership and equivalence queries
已评分: Attribute exploration
第 6 周
Working with real data
A concept lattice can be exponentially large in the size of its formal context. Sometimes this can be due to noise in data. We'll study a few heuristics to filter out noisy concepts or select the most interesting concepts in a large lattice built from real data: stability and separation indices, concept probability, iceberg lattices. We will also talk about association rules, which is a name for implications that are supported by strong evidence, but may still have counterexamples in data.
11 个视频
- 视频: Iceberg lattices
- 视频: Concept stability
- 视频: Separation index
- 视频: Concept probability
- 视频: Nested line diagrams
- 视频: Association rules
- 视频: Support and confidence
- 视频: Frequent closed sets
- 视频: Luxenburger basis
- 视频: Goodbye!
已评分: Concept indices
已评分: Association rules
常见问题解答
运作方式
Coursework
Each course is like an interactive textbook, featuring pre-recorded videos, quizzes and projects.
Help from Your Peers
Connect with thousands of other learners and debate ideas, discuss course material, and get help mastering concepts.
Certificates
Earn official recognition for your work, and share your success with friends, colleagues, and employers.
制作方
National Research University Higher School of Economics
National Research University - Higher School of Economics (HSE) is one of the top research universities in Russia. Established in 1992 to promote new research and teaching in economics and related disciplines, it now offers programs at all levels of university education across an extraordinary range of fields of study including business, sociology, cultural studies, philosophy, political science, international relations, law, Asian studies, media and communications, IT, mathematics, engineering, and more.
Learn more on www.hse.ru
评分和审阅
This course is a great introduction to Formal concept analysis. You might need some knowledge of mathematics, but I think you do not need so much. If you get accustomed to the way mathematicians do, it would be very helpful.
Since there were no exercises, I treated the quiz questions as exercises. But, that meant I could not see the correct results for answers I had gotten wrong, and I could not see a correct solution (i.e., method of arriving at the correct answer). While the instructor did provide examples in each lecture, these were often much easier than the quiz questions. So, for the future, I recommend a set of exercises with worked solutions to enable the students to sharpen their skill before taking a quiz. Other than that, this was the perfect introduction to FCA for me. I noted down a few ideas I have on some of the topics and methods discussed in the course, but I haven't had time to examine these ideas in detail. Is there some way to contact the instructor later to get his reaction to these ideas?
Great Course. Explained nicely.
The last probability excercise was tough, but worth it.
Go ahead!!