Good

good

good

top

It is good course for introduction. But the flow is not logical. Why this is required is sometime missing. The subtitles (caption as per video when speaker is speaking mismatch, totally mismatch in week 4 part ... The network diagram calculation required more examples to understand it entirely. The video length sometimes find lengthy. It should be not grater than 6-7 minutes. The interview is really good and helpful to know the real life experience.

I would give lesser stars if not for material. The professor is simply reading what is probably displayed to him with no real interest in gaining the viewers attention. Get monotonous to hear him for 4 weeks!!

It is an Average for me compare to other Online sources. Didn't felt an so much richness in the teaching as well as representation techniques. I hope would have choose alternative course.

A lot of information that was necessary for students like us to know before stepping into corporate culture. A little more advance for students who are in their early year of undergrad.

Content was great. The tone & expressions were extremely monotonous & flat with no interactivity, Sub titles were off. All in all I can say that this course has helped me.

Good content but can improve a lot more on presentation. A rather dull approach on that plus transcripts differed from the actual video in one of vidoes in final module.

This coruse is not exactly IT Project Mgmt. There are very few modules and lectures pertaining to IT PM. Most of the concepts are related to operations.

It could have been more engaging instead of just the speech. Real life scenarios / examples could have been used to explain the concepts better.

deberian agregar los subtitulos en español, ya que somos muchos de habla hispana es decir que hablamos español los que seguimos los cursos.

It was an overview kind of thing of thing to understand the terminology. It would have been nice if it was a little more in depth.

Over all course was very useful. The reading material was not sufficient as per my experience for doing crash course

theoretical knowledge was given more need to explain how to manage a project with practical knowledge

I think the teacher has opportunity areas in terms of keeping the audience engage...

The Quality of presentation can improve and also the way it as put for explanation

There are no Physical movements and body movements by the trainer.

I would have like that the course would have been more dynamic,

It has less content than I expected

Could have reduced Week 2.

good

The content was good in terms of a basic introduction. I have my PMP and was looking for more content around PM as it relates to IT PM specifically, and found that this course was more-so a refresher on concepts you will learn while studying for your PMP, with the exception of maybe week 4 that goes a bit into agile PM. The content itself needs to be reviewed, as there are various issues that create distractions while trying to learn. For example if you are following along with the transcript, a lot of times parts of the text will say "inaudible" (ie whoever was writing the transcript was unsure what the professor was saying), typos in the transcript, or words used in the transcript that don't match what the professor was saying (which creates confusion). Separately there are errors with a few quiz questions (ex information in questions related to PV and audits for small projects directly contradict what's in the transcript). And the transcript is wrong for part 2 of monitoring and controlling (it starts over w/ part 1 so there's no way for you to follow along with the text). The other issue is that as the professor is just reading from a transcript, it might be difficult to grasp certain concepts related to calculations because you are just listening to formulas being read with little context or background to help illustrate the concept better. Overall I think this is a good intro to PM, but for a learning platform I was surprised with so many errors in the content.

Modules were monologue. Very less use of graphics, animations, and/or case studies. Mathematical concepts were plainly spoken in English without adequate examples or number crunching. The physical posture of the instructor was very odd and he seemed to be reading out from a script.