This course was so helpful. I think I now understand the fundamentals of mathematical logic. I truly recommend this course to anyone who is interested in studying logic!
Pros:\n\n1.good contents\n\n2.good exercises and interesting puzzles\n\n3.good examples\n\nCons:\n\n1.No video\n\n2. need more examples
创建者 Jakub K•
Very solid one.
A page turner.
创建者 Uha I•
创建者 Samuel L d S•
创建者 Rhea B•
创建者 Ze M•
创建者 Everton d c s•
创建者 María A A Z•
创建者 Deleted A•
创建者 Mubarak I•
创建者 Dino P•
创建者 Antonio C•
创建者 Kelsey P•
I enjoyed the structure of the course content. Some of this content does appear to be outdated (or at least fairly orthogonal in development) compared to more recent logic study sources (e.g. Hurley). It also quickly descends into difficult material in the last week that needed an especially acute level of research and attention to follow. It turned out, though, that the last sets of questions could be completed without actually comprehending and filling out the work for them, due to a bug in the software perhaps. Nonetheless, I respect and appreciate Stanford's publishing this for those of us who enjoy logic and wish to be challenged to take up the next level. Thank you!
创建者 Gustavo S d S•
Covers a broad content of Logic: Resolutional Logic, Propositional Logic, Herband Logic.
Good analogies and examples from daily life, explaining where logic can be applied.
You will be able to see the things more logically and (depending on you) improve your programming skills.
However some topics should be fixed, there are technical problems in some weeks of the course. The lack of videos and lectures might be an issue, the written sections are not very engaging. There should be more resources and interactive tools. The exercises are challenging and demands time.
创建者 Kaushal M•
Really good course on logic. It explains everything without dumbing it down, however, that also means that the course gets really hard at times and I wish there were more examples as I felt a bit unprepared for the assignments, which were really hard. Also, there are no video lectures so be prepared to do a lot of reading. But if you are truly interested in basic logic, you will learn a lot from this course!
创建者 Alex W•
A pain if completing this course when the session not started yet. Without forum talking about solutions to exercise, usually in some exercises you could only stare at the screen for several hours, fell in deep despair, and eventually came up an answer by luck. Not a good experience, but the material is good though, if not considering the difficutly of understanding the text in the later lessons
创建者 Tage M•
Great introduction to logic.
One thing I'd have appreciated to see is a set of accompanying recorded video lectures. My experience is that I find it easier in term of efforts and faster in term of time to absorb taught concepts when I engage both my hearing and sight senses while watching a lecture than reading only.
创建者 Sihyung L•
Some concepts in Week 9 were not very understandable, but other weeks were good. I thank all who have contributed and prepared this course. I wish that in the next version of this course, there are some exercises using real-world logic tools, such as SAT solvers.
创建者 Ian A•
This is a really good course. My only issue was I found some of the weeks quite a bit harder than others. It was helpful to look at the notes for each week in advance to figure out which ones would be tougher and allow for that.
创建者 David G M•
I struggled real hard with some proofs. The main problem was the lack of examples or tutorials on how to use the rules of inference. Perhaps one or two videos could help??
创建者 Yiye D•
Somehow difficult in the last several weeks. As almost all the materials are all in words, students may sometimes feel bored seeing all lines and complex tables.
创建者 Samuel O•
I feel like some things could have been explained better, maybe a better description of how the fitch tool worked. Other than that, it was a great course!
创建者 Chatziiosifidis A•
Very interesting course
But some parts are not just to technical but rather for technicians and not for persons looking more into the theoretical aspects