Feb 17, 2017
The course was a concise and effective review of major concepts. The concepts were well explained and the lessons practical. I have a better understanding of fatigue failure as a result of this class.
Jun 12, 2017
Thank you so much. I liked your teaching style.You gave me a clear understanding about each and every topic covered in this course.I enjoyed the learning.Hope we will be in touch for further courses.
创建者 Muhammad S K•
Feb 02, 2019
This course was really great for me. I learned a lot about the basic of Machine design and looking for to contribute in part 2 & 3
创建者 Priyanka F P•
Feb 12, 2019
A good technical course!
创建者 Juan P G•
Feb 14, 2019
It has been very useful to recall this knowledge.
创建者 Syed A A S•
Mar 06, 2019
This course of machine design from Georgia Tech is a nice combination of revising the concepts of material properties, design and temperature considerations, design theories for static and dynamic loading situations for a safe design. The instructor knows her domain and my time went well. Thanks to Georgia Tech. and Coursera platform for the effort.
创建者 Daniel L•
Mar 13, 2019
I enjoyed the practical and summarized approach (both static and fatigue failure). I would have liked developing skills about the aluminum and composite parts, materials commonly used in aeronautics.
Thank you very much for your involvement in these e-learning courses
创建者 shyam m s•
Oct 07, 2018
good explain skill
创建者 juan a c b•
Aug 26, 2017
very important for mechanical engineering, for keep in mind all the topics of strength and stress.
创建者 Gary U•
Dec 23, 2016
A good introductory course to gain an appreciation of some of the theory and techniques that goes into designing mechanical systems in our modern world. Real world cases are discussed, and I have become aware of some of the failure mechanisms in airplanes and in the body skeleton, so I am a bit more leary of taking airplane flights , and not jumping off high places while twirling. You need to be familiar with basic theory of stress and strain before taking this course, there is a series of courses available on Coursea as pre-requisite. The way the quizzes are scheduled makes it advantageous to watch the videos early in the week and take the quiz as soon as possible, since you get only one attempt every 24 hours. Enjoyed the course.
创建者 Felipe W•
Dec 22, 2016
Es un muy buen curso para comprender los conceptos generales en el diseño mecánico, me gustó el enfoque que se le dio a los módulos de fatiga.
Aunque en algunos momentos faltaba un poco más de detalle en la explicación de los módulos.
创建者 Joshua K•
Dec 28, 2016
Great look at fatigue failure. Looking forward to Parts II, III, etc
创建者 Nissan G•
Dec 28, 2017
A great intro course to basic failure theories and more engineering analysis skills. There are lots of worksheets and if you do them all you'll gain from this course.
创建者 Benjamin D•
Jul 07, 2018
Very well explained and well paced. Sometimes instructor's answers are wildly different from your own because she uses exact numbers but only writes rounded numbers.
创建者 Simon L•
Aug 22, 2017
Give it a 4 top notch, the examples where explicit quite challenging needed some nimble thinking and prompt responces. Just the Discussion forum was a bit biased and the questions where somehow not understood
创建者 Syed T H A•
Sep 08, 2017
Very helpful course with comprehensive overview of design and techniques in Engineering Design. Beautifully designed course.
Jan 30, 2018
A full fledged view on machine design.
I being an average learner learnt a lot in Machine design through this course. The user interface and lectures are really great! I wanted to thank Dr. Katheryn for her support.
创建者 Rajadurai N•
Aug 06, 2017
Great! First time I hear about Ashby plots and love the case study method. Dr.Wingate was excellent in conveying the concept throughout the course!
创建者 KHODABUCCUS M M•
Nov 08, 2017
Overall course quality, approach and content were satisfying. i enjoyed doing this course. it helped me understand some critical factors i need to consider in the mechanical engineering field as far as design of a component is concern.
Looking forward to do more courses in Coursera to increase my knowledge.
Apr 08, 2018
good class，beautiful teacher
创建者 Brian L•
Jun 13, 2018
Very clear in objectives and to the point when discussing problems. Lectures are not spent deriving formulas but discussing meaningful and insightful problems for the practical engineer.
创建者 TUSHAR C•
May 11, 2018
Its a very good course , a lot of things to learn
创建者 Carlos A C C•
Jun 06, 2019
El curso fue muy bueno para recordar y mejorar algunas de las habilidades en el ambito de la ingenieria estructural. A pesar de ser un curso introductorio fue muy bueno, puesto que lo aprendido es la base para continuar con conceptos mucho mas complejos. Me agrado mucho la metodologia, y la forma de ensenanza de parte de la profesora la cual intenta por todos los medios que se entienda la materia. Ahora estoy en espera de que en algun momento se abra un curso de Machine Design II.
创建者 MOHAMMAD A K•
Jun 30, 2019
I enjoyed the course. It was an amazing experience to learn concepts one by one in small- small videos.
创建者 Isaac S•
Aug 09, 2019
I enjoyed the course, it was good to recap on areas that I'd forgotten, and also learn some new skills. The lecture videos were very clear and concise and all the material was well explained.
Negatives - There did seem to be some errors (in my opinion) in some of the combined stress questions (or at the very least some bad explanation / errors in the solutions documents which seemed to be contrary to what was taught in Georgia Tech's Mechanics of Materials IV course on coursera). Also, the lecture slide pdfs were sometimes missing bits that were in the videos. There were also seperate pdfs for each short video, so there are around 40 pdfs that cover all the course material which was a bit of a pain, I think It would've been much easier to have a pdf of all the slides for each week.
Oct 27, 2019
Some more complicated and industry related problem should be added.
创建者 Divyanshu K•
Nov 07, 2019
very informative but hard