Jul 12, 2020
Solid course that dives deeper into the fundamentals of CS. Great instruction, attention to detail and the excercises are adequately challenging for beginners and lower-intermediate programmers.
Jul 9, 2022
Jen and Paul provide thorough and understandable explanations of Python as a programming language. The assignments are challenging and test the student's knowledge of the subject well.
创建者 Mohsen H•
Jul 29, 2019
one of the instructors, (Paul) is frustratingly confusing and unorganized!! sigh ....
创建者 Iván G•
Jun 25, 2019
Good course, but not everything was well explained, and the mentors didn't show up.
创建者 Mikhail G•
Feb 18, 2019
It is better to have more bite-sized assignments than the last one
创建者 Aldana B R•
Jun 27, 2019
The topics were good, but they were not well explained.
创建者 Bohdan S•
Nov 6, 2017
Incorrect tasks. Many problems.
创建者 Olajuwon S•
Apr 24, 2017
创建者 Darien M•
Dec 21, 2019
This course gets two stars because it is free and you have access to all assignments (and they are "graded"). I recommend taking this course only if you have some experience with Python and want to use it as a tune up for a more advanced course. In other words, skip the lectures/readings and just work on the quizzes and assignments. If you are new to programming I do not recommend this course. Take the Python for Everybody sequence then follow that up with the Python3 sequence (both from UMich).
If you happen to get stuck on something, use your old courses or other resources for help as the materials in this course are of low quality. There is a reason why hardly anyone is taking anymore. Additionally, not much help can be found in the discussion forums either. Some assignment instructions are unclear and the feedback from the auto grader is not helpful. There is also a peer graded assignment, which I am not a big fan of, although the assignment itself if okay.
There is actually some good content in this course, especially for learning doctest and unittest. As far as I can tell, no other intro courses touch on these subjects. The Week 5 project involves classes that interact, which is a nice way to cap things off. I'd rate this course higher if it was not specifically for beginners.
创建者 bob a•
Nov 22, 2020
I'm unsure if I'm missing something, a book or online docs i should peruse. I am totally lost in this course so far. The 20 year old videos breeze through the material and than I'm somehow supposed to answer 10-12 vague questions on topics we've not really examined in depth? That or it's early onset dementia. I've mucked about with python on and off for 15 years or so but it seems to be of little help.
Not to be hypercritical but, the site is clumsy and moves from screen to screen and I've the feeling I'm missing large chunks of course load? I've designed Web pages over 20 years ago and have been an active computer user and hobbyist for 40 year now so it's hardly new or foreign to me.
I took your first test 4? times. My score went from 30 to 30 to 50 and finally after really Appling myself i managed a 16! ? Guess I wont be quitting my day job anytime soon.
I had also signed up on 2 other site for python online and am faring much better than here? Well, take it for whatever it may be worth ,just thought I'd comment.
I do appreciate this course being offered gratis. Though the old platitude, you get what you pay for, seems somewhat app.
创建者 James D B•
Jul 13, 2020
My favorite part of this course was learning about Python's built-in modules doctest and unittest.
However, in general, this course is out of date, and had a bad "user experience":
-Instructions were not clear on auto-graded assignment, and I had to read through forum posts to understand intent
-Throughout the class, a bunch of multiple choice questions had rendering errors ("Missing closing brace") such that the questions could not be rendered, and I couldn't answer
-The course uses a deprecated version of Python
-Sometimes, in an effort to be useful for beginners, the course (in my opinion) incorrectly simplified things
-The course would ask multiple choice questions at times based on the made up scenarios, seemingly just to make sure you were paying attention
创建者 Samantha W•
Mar 1, 2021
Part 1 in Learn to Program was excellent. Part 2 (Crafting Quality Code) was not as good.
This course seemed rushed. I struggled keeping up with the videos even with being able
to pause the video. The pace is like going a 10 miles a minute. There also isn't any help on the
discussion forum and it is flooded with questions and no answers. It doesn't appear to have an
active moderator for the forum.
创建者 José I•
Feb 29, 2020
创建者 Guy M•
Sep 5, 2018
Rather poor value. On the one hand I learned what a few different sort algorithms were, on the other hand that topic seemed utterly out of place and irrelevant for the course. One week contained barely half an hour of lecture videos, which feels like a token gesture. The main thing I got out of the course, to its credit, was an introduction to doctest and unittest, but that feels like very poor value. I'm sure a good online tutorial would do more and save you £36.
创建者 Oleksandra C•
Nov 30, 2020
My work after 1 week neglecting the deadlines by Coursera is still non-reviewed. I also reviewed 18 students works, and I wrote on forum. There's no result
创建者 Alexis M•
Mar 17, 2017
I've started the course and i have found "learn to program" part, but where is "quality code"?
创建者 121910309040 N A K•
Oct 14, 2021