课程概述
热门审阅
This is wonderful course especially for research scholars, one suggestion is instead of giving articles from books, please provide a PPT which will be more effective ! thank you for wonderful session.
A well made lesson with focus of what matters the most in research. The university of London along with Coursera did a great job at pointing out how research topics should be approached.\n\nThank you
1726 - 了解研究方法 的 1750 个评论（共 1,755 个）
创建者 Upasna G
•I think the course need to be more exhaustive.
创建者 Saquib B H
•The contents could have been better.
创建者 Rawan I B H
•Not adding any valuable information
创建者 Sintra S
•Not really detailed
创建者 Xavier O
•yeah
创建者 David W
•Peer reviewing quality was very poor, and I didn't receive any feedback that I could learn from. There was a mismatch between the simplicity of the points in the videos and the complexity of the readings, and there was no assistance with the reading, e.g. supporting notes or videos discussing the readings. The discussion facility was not used for any actual discussion of the material, but was filled with requests for peer reviewing including at least one that said 'I'll give you a good mark if you give me one'.
The useful aspect was completing the assignments, which made me watch the videos and read the sources, but, as I say, there was no subsequent useful feedback.
创建者 Aastha s
•This course is not what it boasts to be.Just some random interviews are posted without doing any work on developing the content and structuring the presentation.Pier review system even makes it worse.I was expecting a more structured presentation rather than beating around the bush.Rather than giving reference to the materials you can make some efforts to create content of your own.If you are looking for course on research methods the course by university of Amsterdam is the best hands down.
创建者 Zafar A
•The course could be done much better. It is basically people being interviewed about what research is and they ask the same questions to 4 different people with similar answers. Also the course organisers get u the paying customer to review as oppose to do it themselves -I think this is not fair and u get no input from the course organiser. How this course got an award is beyond me. Coursea should remove this course or get new people to do it properly.
创建者 Manuel S
•It is a really basic course. I don't recommend it because the videos are not well organized and the assignments are not clear. It also demands to give feedback with at least 50 words, this is not applicable to submissions that require a minimun of 400 words but participants dont take the course seriously and write a copuple of lines. Also, the interviews from the videos are not well organized and the people interviewed dont always make a good point.
创建者 Zokir A
•Except for the material prepared by Harvard about research methods I couldn't find anything attractive in this course. Unfortunately, instructors were not influential. They spoke with a very low tone and lacked enthusiasm. I remember one of them saying that they represent good researchers. What? Personally or professionally I don't know you, but by your speaking or enthusiasm you are not representing "good researchers".
创建者 Mithra A
•The course could have been organized better. The tittle tells understanding the research methods and the instructors had hardly discussed any. The interview they take with other people could just be a supplementary videos and not the main course content itself. It was quite shocking to know to the entire content has just the interviewed opinions.
创建者 Marc G
•I found this course way too sketchy and lacking in information. The module on literature reviews was good, but other than that, the course was devoid of content and I do not feel like my knowledge of research methods has increased after completing the course.
创建者 Chad J
•It gave me some interesting ideas to consider but didn't delve into how to do any of them. For example we read three chapters about the importance of a organized, methodical literature review, but there wasn't anything on how to do it methodically.
创建者 Rasha S
•The course does not have a clear structure or structured lectures. The videos are of people giving their opinion of the topics and there are no definitive ways given. It just feels too unorganized and difficult to follow.
创建者 Fatima L
•This is absolutely terrible. The readings are badly written sections of a book and the people interviewed (with the exception of Halperin) are spewing nothing but vague nebulous motherhood statements. Very disappointing.
创建者 Ashhadullah F
•Said that If you can pass the exam, you will be given a free certificate, but the certificate was not given..... Cheater... Cheated with me..... Don't trust your Institute/organization
创建者 abdulla m
•appreciate the hard work that authors had do to complete the course , my personal rate is low as i didn't enjoy the course , video boring
创建者 Renan J S L
•The lectures are more fo pep talks. The course did not really give a lot of detail on research methods.
创建者 Daniel Z
•Minimal content. The course explores a very relevant topic in a very shallow way.
创建者 Agrivino V P A
•It's a piece of garbage, because we can't download the pdfs.
创建者 Deepak K S
•did not receive any completion mail or any certificate
创建者 Valentina E
•The course seemed to me too short and sketchy.
创建者 Anish K
•Far Below expectations. No inputs
创建者 Amirheckmat T
•Not very good course in my view.
创建者 Sterling J R
•Really Didn't like the course.
Coursera Footer
