Though I have worked on Customer Analytics with my previous work experiences and also on Surveys etc at George Brown College Canada, this module was more than insightful. Lots of learning to learn eh!
This course includes a comprehensive overview of the all the basic models that are used to analyze data concerning customer behavior. The real-life examples made it easier to relate to those theories.
创建者 Lauri S•
While these courses have interesting subjects, the content is very light, requires little effort and hence results in little learning.
创建者 sebastien k•
Good introduction to get an helicopter view on the topic.
Lacking of hands on exercises and explanation of more advanced concepts.
创建者 Clifford N D•
Basic course on customer analytics, was expecting a little more advanced content looking at the course content and structure.
创建者 Cackowska D•
it was quite difficult to follow , due the language barrier and it was only overview , they could gave a bit more informa
创建者 Manoj J•
I was expecting some models will be designed and solved in the class sessions. But the lectures contain only theories.
创建者 Hussein M•
the course is introduction and it's not deep , i felt bored actually plus i was afraid form the Indian professor
创建者 Ananth V B•
Lots of theory and concepts, but little in the way of how to solve customer analytics problems yourself.
创建者 Hugo S C•
The material is very superficial and there is not much practice; all quizzes are conceptual only.
创建者 Gladys L•
Compared to Operations Analytics class, this class does not provide as much applicable skills.
创建者 Noel F•
Very high level course, interesting as a background but doesn't really deep dive in any topic.
创建者 Harsh P•
Need some practical application assignments instead of a quiz!
创建者 Semen G•
Субтитры не работают, тесты в любом случае на английском
创建者 Daniel A•
It did not satisfy my thirst for knowledge on this topic
创建者 Зотов В А•
Too basic. Rather an overview, than an actual course
创建者 Maria K•
Maybe could be more extensive and profound
创建者 Jonathan Z•
Almost no practical application
创建者 Timothy D•
Not enough real world examples
创建者 Svetlana K•
Outdated slides and lectures
创建者 J R•
创建者 Jesus V•
The examination at the very end of every week must be taken once and you can retake it after 24 hrs, the questions must be different everytime you repaet it, add additional choices like instead of 5 choices make it 10, or use the Choose which all that applies principle. By making it rig free you are giving credibility to the exam and the test takers itself. The reason why on line course are not taken seriously is just because you can rig the result of the exam by keep on repeating taking it and memorizing the choices in the questions. YOU HAVE TO RESTRATEGIZE HOW NOT TO RIG THE EXAM so that it has credibilty and taken seriously.
创建者 Diane M•
Poorly designed. The lectures just consist of people talking to the camera with little visual aids. There aren't any materials to read over or study. The transcripts of the videos come in a .txt file... On the whole, really not at all the caliber I would have wanted to see from Wharton. If I had paid for this course, I would be really frustrated.
创建者 Anas M•
Quiz questions were not clear. Content was subpar for a "top" university. It seems like this was nothing more than a haphazardly put together course to make money and nothing more. This course felt like a complete waste of time and I believe the concepts and material in the modules are outdated.
创建者 Jiang T•
In fact, i think this course is waste my time because the course only have lecture. They don't tell you how to use software to solve the problem even do not give any practical homework. Compared to other course, the quality of this course is extremely low.
创建者 Abdullah A D•
It's hard to follow along, the instructor is mostly reading of slides and the level of teaching is of a low standard. The content is actually very good but its not put together well enough for a beginner in the field to capture the information.
创建者 Jarratt O•
audio is bad. takes too long to move from the fluff and abstract to anything concrete. week 3 has A HUGE gap between lectures and quizzes. showed some interesting concepts but doesnt tell us how we can get there and thus take data for granted