Chevron Left
返回到 Fundamentals of Quantitative Modeling

学生对 宾夕法尼亚大学 提供的 Fundamentals of Quantitative Modeling 的评价和反馈

4.6
8,051 个评分

课程概述

How can you put data to work for you? Specifically, how can numbers in a spreadsheet tell us about present and past business activities, and how can we use them to forecast the future? The answer is in building quantitative models, and this course is designed to help you understand the fundamentals of this critical, foundational, business skill. Through a series of short lectures, demonstrations, and assignments, you’ll learn the key ideas and process of quantitative modeling so that you can begin to create your own models for your own business or enterprise. By the end of this course, you will have seen a variety of practical commonly used quantitative models as well as the building blocks that will allow you to start structuring your own models. These building blocks will be put to use in the other courses in this Specialization....

热门审阅

AP

Jun 15, 2019

Very clear and articulate explanation of the concepts. He doesn't skip a step in the sequencing ideas, drawing comparisons and differences, and illustrating both visually and story-telling. Excellent.

S

Nov 30, 2020

for the beginer like me i have experience in banking of 8 years still for me this fundamentals are new specially quantitative modelling.Kindly provide banking related examples in here too.

thanks

筛选依据:

1451 - Fundamentals of Quantitative Modeling 的 1475 个评论(共 1,537 个)

创建者 Johnny V

Jul 10, 2016

Felt a little rudimentary until the last week. I hope the specialization picks up after this point.

创建者 Michael S

Dec 6, 2017

Not enough about formulas or real world application. Was hoping to see examples applied in Excel.

创建者 Sidney A

May 8, 2016

Nice primer for modeling, but wish there were more workable problems to help hit the point home.

创建者 Bharat J

Jun 20, 2020

Too descriptive for a quantitative course. Would've preferred more problem solving exercises.

创建者 Eike A H

Sep 9, 2019

-no explanation on errors

-too theoretical and abstract with lack of examples and own practice

创建者 S B

Mar 26, 2018

Could have been more advanced from the perspective of practical use-cases of data modeling.

创建者 jyoti v

Oct 23, 2018

The course is a bit too introductory for me. I'm looking for more challenging material.

创建者 Kangkang W

Oct 17, 2016

most contents are explicit on ppt, it is sometimes not necessary to view the lectures.

创建者 Josh R

May 17, 2020

Lots of information, not much opportunity to apply practical usage to the theories

创建者 martino g

Mar 30, 2020

Content is good but the teacher is extremely boring. Had to struggle to finish it.

创建者 Paul M

Jul 7, 2020

My name was spelled incorrectly on my certificate, how to do I correct this?

创建者 Mathew L

Apr 27, 2016

I would have liked the quizzes to explain why an answer was right or wrong.

创建者 Brendan C

May 22, 2018

good course, quizzes should not be locked though...disappointed with that.

创建者 Deleted A

Feb 19, 2018

I think the contents of this course can be more difficult and challenging.

创建者 Michelle l G

Feb 9, 2017

It was an interesting module, however, not sure how I will apply this in

创建者 Gary V

Jul 11, 2017

Very basic things that any person with a stats background should know

创建者 Alec E

Jul 23, 2020

Not that enjoyable. Decent information but pretty boring to watch.

创建者 Abhed M

Jan 12, 2020

It should be more rigorous. I completed this course in three days.

创建者 Chalal S

Oct 8, 2021

The explaining is good, but the concepts in the course are basic.

创建者 Dominique B

Apr 8, 2020

a bit too simple, I would have expected more practical excersises

创建者 TheSovereignIndividual

Apr 13, 2020

Nice, course - could spend more time on practice and examples.

创建者 Anup K D

May 2, 2021

Need more examples. Logarithmic Regression was not very clear

创建者 Olivia X

Sep 18, 2016

too easy. not enough practical skills or tools teaching

创建者 Abhishek P

Feb 9, 2017

There should be lab or hands one calculation exercise.

创建者 Steeve V

Feb 3, 2017

It was theoretical but provided an apt understanding.