Explore
For Enterprise
Join for Free
Log In

艺术与人文
商务
计算机科学
数据科学
信息技术
健康
数学和逻辑
个人发展
物理科学与工程
社会科学
语言学习
学位
证书

浏览 Coursera 的全部课程

浏览
搜索
企业版
登录
免费加入

5.1 Robespierre and 'virtue'

Loading...

法国大革命

墨尔本大学

4.8（306 个评分） | 28K 名学生已注册

The French Revolution was one of the most important upheavals in world history. This course examines its origins, course and outcomes. This course is designed for you to work through successfully on your own. However you will not be alone on this journey. Use the resources included in the course and take part in the suggested learning activities to get the most out of your learning. To successfully complete this course, it is recommended that you devote at least six hours to every module over the six weeks of the course. In that time you should watch the video lectures, reflect and respond to in-video pause points, and complete the quizzes. As part of the required reading for this course, during each week of this course you will have free access to a chapter of Peter McPhee's textbook, The French Revolution, which is also available for purchase as an e-book.

查看授课大纲

审阅

4.8（306 个评分）

5 stars
252 ratings
4 stars
44 ratings
3 stars
7 ratings
2 stars
3 ratings

AB

Aug 17, 2016

This was one of the best courses that I took at Coursera. The wide ranging knowledge of Professor McPhee is impressive. The course was well organized and well presented.

FF

Mar 30, 2017

Excellent ..I always knew ABOUT the French Revolution - i.e it happened- but I never understood the FULL consequences. Thank you, Professor McPhee..

从本节课中

Week 5 - Ending the Terror and Ending the Revolution

This week we look at the ideology and culture of the 'Terror' and the nature of the Jacobin and sans-culottes alliance. We will consider possible explanations for the increasing intensity of revolutionary violence and ask whether such violence was a proportionate, emergency response to the growing counter-revolutionary threat. This module also deals with the end of the 'Terror', and the overthrow of Robespierre and the ensuing 'Thermidorian reaction'. Finally we look at the 'settlement' of 1795 and ask whether the Revolution was indeed over.

5.1 Robespierre and 'virtue'9:56

5.2 The ideology and culture of the Terror13:07

5.3 The Jacobin and sans-culottes alliance12:25

5.4 Emergency measures or revolutionary violence?11:07

5.5 Thermidor Year II - 27 July 179410:33

5.6 The 'settlement' of 1795: the end of the Revolution?15:02

教学方

Peter McPhee
Honorary, Melbourne Graduate School of Education

脚本

Hello again, and welcome to week 5 of the course.

You might remember that last week, I sketched out the

great crisis that republicans faced in the middle of 1793,

a crisis that it was at the same time, military, political, economic and social,

and described the way in which, by the end of 1793, the

emergency measures that had been put

in place had reaped quite extraordinary gains.

That the incursions of enemy troops in particular had been halted,

and many of the really hotspots of counter-revolution had been dampened down.

It was in that context that two of the great figures among French Republicans,

first of all, Camille Desmoulins and

secondly Georges Danton, launched a campaign to

effectively wind down these emergency measures, arguing

that the crisis was sufficiently under control,

that suspects could be released from prison, that capital punishments for overt

enemies of the revolution, and so on, could be wound back.

At the end of 1793, they launched a newspaper,

you'll remember called Le Vieux Cordelier, harking back to

their earlier role in the revolution, at the Cordelier Club,

campaigning for a full extension of manhood suffrage.

And in the fourth edition of that newspaper addressed the

committee of public safety directly and

perhaps even Robspierre although not by name.

‘You want to remove all of your enemies by means of the guillotine!’

They exclaimed.

‘Has there ever been such great folly?’

‘Could you make a single man perish on the scaffold, without

making ten enemies for yourself from his family or his friends?

I think quite differently from those who tell you

that terror must remain the order of the day.’

This is a crucial moment, in the history of the French revolution.

How is the Committee of Public

Safety, the Jacobin dominated committee governing France,

Robespierre in particular, likely to respond to this challenge to

wind back, the emergency controls of the terror?

Certainly within the Jacobin club, Danton and Desmoulins are very unpopular,

and Robspierre in particular has to intervene to

protect them from being expelled from that club.

There were two particular problems that Desmoulins

and Danton face in arguing their case.

One is the military one.

And that is, that while the incursions of enemy troops have been

halted, there are still enemy troops on French soil along the borders.

Way down here in the southernmost community of France for example,

a small Pyrenean town called Saint-Laurent-de-Cerdans -

a place of a couple of thousand people that

had lived from iron manufacture, from the pastoral industry

and from a great deal of smuggling across the

border with Spain. In this community, Spanish troops have

been in there for more than six months, making

it one of their headquarters in that part of France.

If you up behind that town, and look through the

Pyrenees, in fact you can make out the Spanish border through this pass,

and it's there where Spanish troops had come through Saint-Laurent in April 1793.

There are still Spanish troops in other words on

on French soil, in many parts of the country.

Interestingly, by the way, down that river valley, just across the border, in

Spain, where the border is in fact a stream that one can step across,

there is the ruins of a tiny chapel. It's there where the former

parish priest of Saint-Lautrent-de-Cerdans had fled the revolution

in 1792 once war broke out, and it had people construct

this tiny little chapel in a field just across the border,

just, a few meters across the border. And it's there where

the devout used to bring their children to be

baptised or where they used to come to marry, and

celebrate mass with a nonjuring, a real member of the clergy.

But certainly then one problem for the Danton-Desmoulins argument

is that the military situation is not yet fully safe.

And a second problem is the one that's pointed out by Robespierre himself,

in what is really his most important speech of the Revolution, I think,

and one of the most important

speeches that anyone makes in the Revolution.

A speech that he makes on the 5th of

February 1794, 17 Pluviose according to the revolutionary calendar.

Where he begins by saying ‘How frivolous it would be to regard a

few victories achieved by patriotism, as the end of all of our dangers’.

The military crisis is not over.

And then he says, and this is a crucial point,

‘It's time to mark clearly the aim of the Revolution.’

Robespierre's saying it's more than just winning the war.

‘We seek an order of things in which all the base and cruel passions are enchained,

all the beneficent and generous passions are awakened

by the laws’. A regenerated society in other words.

‘We wish to substitute in our country, the

empire of reason for the tyranny of custom…

a people magnanimous, powerful and happy

for people lovable, frivolous, and wretched -

that's to say all the virtues and miracles of the

Republic, for all the vices and puerilities of the monarchy.’

The point of the revolution Robespierre is arguing is the creation

of a virtuous society, worthy of a republic, not simply military victory.

In such a situation he argues,

the Committee of Public Safety, the Convention,

the Government of France needs to adopt a policy of both virtue and terror.

‘In this situation, the first maxim of your policy ought to

be lead the people by reason and the people's enemies by terror.

If the mainspring of popular government in peacetime is

virtue, amid revolution it is at once virtue and terror.

Virtue without which terror is fatal,

terror without which virtue is impotent.

And terror is nothing but prompt, severe, inflexible justice.’

In time of peace therefore, a government must, above all, be virtuous.

But in times of revolutionary crisis, it needs both virtue and terror.

The logic of Robespierre's argument of course is that as he put's

it, are not the enemies within the enemies of the allies without.

In other words, is not the logic that

those people who are undermining the Republic from

within, Danton and Desmoulins are logically the allies of the

counter revolutionary armies, they're on the same side.

He identifies two factions. One the Danton-Desmoulins faction which would push

us towards weakness but another faction which would lead towards excess.

And in the following weeks, Robespierre and his allies

within the convention, move against both of those factions.

First of all, a faction connected with Jacques Hebert, who's effectively

the town clerk, the municipal officer of the city of Paris, who

with his allies, is pushing the Committee of Public Safety to

take even more radical action on

the economy and against counter revolutionaries.

And in March, 1794, The Hebertistes as they're called, the

most militant of the sans-culottes, are

arrested, sent to the revolutionary tribunal,

and effectively found guilty of being counter-revolutionary, in the

sense that they're undermining the unity of the Republic

and sent to the guillotine. And this remarkable contemporary

image of the cart taking them towards the guillotine.

And then immediately thereafter the revolutionary tribunal tries Danton

and Desmoulins in the most famous political trials of the Revolution,

where effectively they are accused of malpractice, of financial

corruption, possibly in the case of Danton there was real veracity to that charge.

But above all, they're accused of undermining the unity of the government,

the unity of the Republic, of

being in league objectively with the counter-revolution.

Robspierre is most reluctant to sign their arrest warrants but in the end he does.

And this sketch is done of Danton, on his

way to the guillotine on the 6th of April, 1794.

For Robespierre in particular, this is a difficult

moment because Danton is a close friend and ally.

A few years earlier at the marriage of Camille and

Lucile Desmoulins, Robespierre had been the main witness at the marriage.

He was young Horace's Godfather, but he argues that such is the

situation in April 1794 that they effectively need to be placed on trial.

It's a moment which has always been regarded as

the great political crisis of this

year of the terror. And one which is constantly

reworked, through film, and plays even to the present day.

探索我们的目录

免费加入并获得个性化推荐、更新和优惠。

Coursera 致力于普及全世界最好的教育，它与全球一流大学和机构合作提供在线课程。

© 2019 Coursera Inc. 保留所有权利。

通过 App Store 下载

通过 Google Play 获取

Coursera
关于
管理团队
工作机会
目录
证书
MasterTrack™ 证书
学位
企业版
政府版

社区
Learners
Partners
Developers
Beta Testers
Translators

连接
博客
Facebook
领英
Twitter
Instagram
YouTube
技术博客

更多
条款
隐私
帮助
内容访问
媒体
联系我们
目录
附属公司