Loading...

3.1.2 Asset Allocation - part b

Course video 16 of 25

After completing this module, you will be able to understand the difference between retail asset allocation and institutional asset allocation. You will also be able to understand the importance of time horizon in defining risk.

投资策略

印度商学院

课程 4（共 5 门，Financial Markets and Investment Strategy 专项课程）

Discover the basic concepts of needs analysis, investment policy, asset allocation, product selection, portfolio monitoring and re-balancing. We will look at the types of institutional investors - pension funds and insurance companies. You will learn the client management life cycle and dive into portfolio management as a process. You will learn the basic concepts, principles, and the major styles of investing in alternative assets. Finally, we study the impact of digitization on investment strategies.

查看授课大纲

教学方

Vikram Kuriyan
Clinical Professor of Finance

脚本

[MUSIC]

Correlation and asset allocation.

Not all assets or securities are affected by positive or

negative shocks equally and here in lies the trick of asset allocation.

An ideal asset mix would, in theory, be immune to shocks.

Of course, this is impossible and it's impossible to mitigate all types of risk.

But naive diversification is far superior to no diversification.

Diversifying into the same asset class, choosing a narrow segment of the market

to invest in, accumulating highly correlated assets

in one's portfolio, all of these will undo

any good diversification that you might already have in the portfolio.

Here's a graph that

shows you the correlation characteristics of the major asset classes.

You can see some are highly correlated and some are lowly correlated.

The trick in asset allegation is to put together highly correlated

assets with lowly correlated assets to smooth out returns so

that portfolio shocks will not impede the growth of capital.

If you can find two asset classes with correlations close to zero,

the diversification effects.

Let's just pause for a second.

The closer the correlation to zero is among the different asset classes,

the better the diversity created effects.

Typically, once your risk return profile has been established,

capital is then allocated to various asset classes to achieve

the maximum expected returns for a given level of risk.

The incorrect weighing into an asset class can result in portfolios

with undesirable risk return profiles.

Along with the weightages, it is also crucial to be

aware of the asset class correlations as in the table above by creating a mix.

It is never prudent to put assets with high positive or

negative correlations together in a portfolio.

Positive correlations amplify external shocks, while the latter would serve to

offset any gains with losses from the negatively correlated assets.

There's an art here.

Let's now discuss some of the pitfalls of modern portfolio theory and

the effect of behavioral economics in the context

of asset allocation.

The crisis of 2007, 2008, brought forth many critics of modern portfolio theory.

After all, modern portfolio theory measures risks in terms of

standard deviation, and assumes that investors are rational.

MPT, modern portfolio theory,

states that one should ideally diversify into uncorrelated assets.

But in reality, many asset classes become correlated in times of

crises.

Secondly, what has happened as globalization tends

to connect the world much closer together,

correlations within the asset classes have been rising over the years.

This is especially true of equities.

Global connectivity has made sure that

information gets transmitted to various markets almost immediately and

diversification benefits have now been reduced in equities.

External shocks are also transported very quickly.

What you can see in this chart below is that

correlations among asset classes can be very high and

this is particularly exacerbated during crises.

So, rising correlations have affected the real world implementations of

modern portfolio theory.

Another critique of modern portfolio theory,

which comes out primarily from the behavioral economists, is

that the measure of risk in constructing these portfolios is standard deviation.

Standard deviation has a very symmetrical view of risk because by definition it

measures both upside volatility and downside volatility.

But the reality is that investors are far more risk averse towards the downside.

Draw downs is what they really get worried about, and

don't really care about the upside.

As the behavioral economists have found,

investors are loss averse, that is they worry about the downside.

Investors show risk seeking behavior in the loss domain and

risk averse behavior in the profit domain.

What they typically do is tend to book profits

from winners while they gamble with losers.

These realities need to be considered by asset

allocations while making asset allocation decisions for retail investors.

Because the goal of a good asset allocation is to have

a portfolio that investors can stick through in good times and bad.

And severe draw downs impair the ability of a lot of people, but

particularly in retail, to stick to a disciplined asset allocation.

Now retail funds have got to worry not only about the asset allocation that they

engage in, they've got go worry about the clients who invest in their funds,

and how they will deal with draw downs.

Events in some far corner of the world,

Can have domino effects in the country that the fund manager operates.

I want to come to another important point in the practice

of asset allocation, the need for rebalancing.

The asset allocation decision is not a one-time exercise.

Rather, it is a dynamic process.

Over time, markets change, risk premium changes and so

do the risk appetites of investors.

Our ancestors were generally more risk averse than we are.

Return characteristics of assets might change through economic shocks and

even financial goals might change.

Hence, it is prudent on the part of the investor

to reevaluate the allocations in that portfolio.

If the portfolio has deviated from the stated part or some change has to be made,

then they should be updated as new information comes in.

This may include the removal of certain asset classes,

for example, illiquid securities.

It may involve changing the weights of the asset classes, or

it may, in fact, allow for the addition of new asset classes.

Furthermore, the investor should take into account the fees that

he's being charged by the person who creates his asset allocation.

To conclude, asset allocation exercises in the 90s primarily consisted of allocating

capital to a handful of stocks and bonds with some allocation to cash.

But in the years since then, it has become more complex and nuanced.

Asset class diversification is more common now, but

looking through to the factors is also exceedingly important, as you don't

want portfolios that are concentrated with respect to factor exposures.

What do I mean by factor exposures?

Private equity and public equity are both exposed to equities, even though they're

two completely different asset classes with very different investor profiles.

But they're both concentrated in exposure to one factor.

These need to be put together in a disciplined way.

To conclude, there are elements of science with numbers but

also there is an art in putting together a good asset allocation and

there are many nuances involved.

This graph here demonstrates asset allocation in the past and

asset allocation more common now.

We will explore some of these new answers further in the next few classes.

[MUSIC]

关于 Coursera

课程、专项课程和在线学位均由全世界一流大学和教育机构的顶尖授课教师教授。

Join a community of 40 million learners from around the world

Earn a skill-based course certificate to apply your knowledge

Gain confidence in your skills and further your career

Coursera 致力于普及全世界最好的教育，它与全球一流大学和机构合作提供在线课程。

© 2019 Coursera Inc. 保留所有权利。

通过 App Store 下载

通过 Google Play 获取