理想状态下的市场能够达到高效生产：将总剩余(total surplus)最大化。 但是在现实中的市场并非完美。在本课程中，我们将探索一系列市场存在着缺陷的情形并且理解为什么会出现这些缺陷；同时，我们会了解一些改进措施，比如反托拉斯(antitrust)政策以及其他一些政府的干预措施。 我们会选取日常中的例子——从我们每天购买和享用的货物和服务开始。我们也会在每周的练习里把理论运用到时下大事和政策研讨中。 所有的这些都会使你成为一个可以理解、分析和评价市场结果的，有学识的，有批判精神的思考者。

Loading...

来自 University of Pennsylvania 的课程

微观经济学：当市场“失灵”时

280 个评分

理想状态下的市场能够达到高效生产：将总剩余(total surplus)最大化。 但是在现实中的市场并非完美。在本课程中，我们将探索一系列市场存在着缺陷的情形并且理解为什么会出现这些缺陷；同时，我们会了解一些改进措施，比如反托拉斯(antitrust)政策以及其他一些政府的干预措施。 我们会选取日常中的例子——从我们每天购买和享用的货物和服务开始。我们也会在每周的练习里把理论运用到时下大事和政策研讨中。 所有的这些都会使你成为一个可以理解、分析和评价市场结果的，有学识的，有批判精神的思考者。

从本节课中

Monopoly Continued

Monopolies come in various types: one price monopoly, natural monopoly, price discrimination and monopolistic competition. This week we will expand the basic monopoly model to cover these cases and then explore market outcomes in each case. We will also discuss how government may intervene in such cases to benefit society as a whole and increase the surplus generated by the market.

- Rebecca SteinSenior Lecturer

Economics

[MUSIC]

One solution to the natural monopoly is to have one firm, but to regulate the firm.

So I'd like to spend a few minutes talking about two common methods for regulation.

One method of regulating the firm,

is setting what is known as marginal cost pricing.

Marginal cost pricing, as the name implies,

is setting the price equal to marginal cost.

So suppose the marginal cost is $5, the government steps in and

tells the firm you have to sell at a price of $5.

So that the price is equal to the marginal cost.

From efficiency perspective, we can see that this makes sense.

Because price, of course, is equal to marginal benefit and lo and

behold it's equal to the marginal cost and we get the efficient output.

We can see that, graphically, if the price is equal to marginal cost,

the quantity purchased by the consumers Is going to be the efficient quantity.

So we're producing, where marginal cost equals marginal benefit,

and there's no dead weight loss.

So what is the problem with this method?

The problem is then marginal cost pricing only pays for

the marginal cost which is equal to the average variable cost.

So it pays for having the extra rider ride the train but

it's not paying for putting the system in place.

It is not covering the costs of the fixed investment that's needed.

We're not covering the fixed cost of production.

So the government has to pair marginal cost pricing with the second step,

which is paying for the fixed cost of production.

How big are the fixed cost of production?

Well we know what the average fixed cost is.

The average fixed cost is always the difference

between the average variable cost, and the average total cost.

It's true for any quantity including this quantity that we're producing.

So this vertical distance between the average variable cost and

the average total cost, this vertical distance is the average fixed cost.

Times the quantity and we get that this rectangle here,

these are the fixed costs of production.

So what the government needs to do, it needs to set a marginal cost pricing rule.

But it has to add a lump sum subsidy,

a one time subsidy equal to the fixed costs.

This way, the company will be interested in entering the business.

They paid for the infrastructure, they start setting up the transportation system

and then every rider that they provide ridership for,

they cover exactly the variable cost through the marginal cost pricing rule.

So that is one method of regulation.

Let's think of a second method.