ModPo is a fast-paced introduction to modern and contemporary U.S. poetry, with an emphasis on experimental verse, from Emily Dickinson and Walt Whitman to the present. Participants (who need no prior experience with poetry) will learn how to read poems that are supposedly "difficult." We encounter and discuss the poems one at a time. It's much easier than it seems! Join us and try it! Yes, the next live, interactive 10-week session of ModPo will begin on September 8, 2018, and will conclude on November 19, 2018. Al Filreis will be in touch with you by email before the September 8 start of the course with all the information you'll need to participate. If you have questions, you can email the ModPo team at modpo@writing.upenn.edu. During the 10 weeks of the course, you will be guided through poems, video discussions of each poem, and community discussions of each poem. And (unique among open online courses) we offer weekly, interactive live webcasts. Our famed TAs also offer office hours throughout the week. We help arrange meet-ups and in-site study groups. If you are curious about the ModPo team, type "ModPo YouTube introduction" into Google or your favorite search engine, and watch the 20-minute introductory video. You will get an overview of the course and will meet the brilliant TAs, who will be encountering the poems with you all the way to the end. If you use Facebook, join the always-thriving ModPo group: from inside Facebook, search for "Modern & Contemporary American Poetry" and then request to be added as a member. If you have any questions about ModPo, you can post a question to the FB group and you'll receive an almost instant reply. We tweet all year long at @ModPoPenn and you can also find ModPo colleagues using the hashtag #ModPoLive. ModPo is hosted by—and is housed at—the Kelly Writers House at 3805 Locust Walk on the campus of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia USA. All ModPo'ers are welcome to visit the Writers House when they are in our area. Our discussions are filmed there. Our live webcasts take place in the famed "Arts Cafe" of the House. To find out what's going on at the Writers House any time, just dial 215-746-POEM.
watch video on Cid Corman's "It isnt for want"
Loading...
来自 University of Pennsylvania 的课程
Modern & Contemporary American Poetry (“ModPo”)
164 个评分
从本节课中
chapter 1.2 (week 2)—Whitmanians & Dickinsonians
<p><b>Week 2 of ModPo 2018 runs from Sunday, September 16 at 9 AM through Sunday, September 23 at 9 AM. </b>For those doing ModPo on their own or in small groups, the week 2 materials are open and available all year.</p><p>During this week, the second half of chapter 1, we will read the work of two poets writing in the Whitmanian mode and three poets writing in the Dickinsonian mode. We will encounter our Whitmanians, William Carlos Williams and Allen Ginsberg, again later in the course—Williams as a modernist and Ginsberg as a Beat poet. The Whitman/Williams/Ginsberg connection is a strong one; Ginsberg wrote directly in response to both Whitman and Williams and saw the lineage as crucial to the development of his approach. Our Dickinsonians are more disparate in their response to Dickinson’s writing. Of the three—Lorine Niedecker, Cid Corman, and Rae Armantrout—only the last could be said to be a direct poetic descendant of Emily Dickinson's aesthetic. </p><p><b>ASSIGNMENTS:</b> During this week, there are two quizzes due and a writing assignment. Writing assignment #1 is open for submission between 9 AM on 9/17/18 and 9 AM on 9/23/18; after that, peer reviews will be submitted any time between 9 AM on 9/24/18 and 9 AM on 9/30/18. There is also a live webcast on Thursday, September 20, at noon (Philadelphia time).</p>
与讲师见面
Al FilreisKelly Professor, Dir. Center for Programs in Contemporary Writing, Faculty Dir. Kelly Writers House
So Cid Corman wrote thousands of poems. Not all of them as good as this one.
But, just, he, he wrote like this a lot. And I don't think anybody really thinks of
him in the Dickinson tradition. But we want, we want to, you know, give it
a try. We don't know what it is, really.
We don't know what it is, but let's give it a try.
It, it isn't for want of something to say. It isn't, it isn't for this, it is for
that. It, it isn't for want of something to say.
What's. >> It.
>> Why don't, I think it is always kind of a problem, right?
>> Right. Right.
>>, Well, no it isn't. >> Well yeah.
>> I mean. >> [laugh] >> [inaudible] non-poetic,
non-modern, pre-modern [inaudible] speech. It refers to something that been referred
to already. So.
The mug, I drank from the mug, excuse me. >> It is big.
>> Mm-hm. >> It contains a lot of liquid.
Okay, so it, it in our world is always open-ended.
And John Ashbury is going to make the most of these open pronouns much later in the
course. But anyway, go ahead.
>> I'm mean here, I guess, it's maybe the purpose of what he's about to do.
>> The whole thing, this whole thing. I think that's probably right.
Americe? >> I think it speaks to a need that
everyone can universally feel, that you can't.
>> Pinpoint, describe. >> The inevitable.
>> Or identify. >> The thing, the X, the thing that must
happen, or must be said, it. >> Hm.
>> Whatever it is, It isn't said, or done, or acted out.
For want of something to say. Want.
>> What, what does that mean, Anna? You probably don't use this word, in your.
>>, Sway. >> I guess I think to say, that it isn't
for want of something to say. It means that it's not because I don't
have anything to say. >> Okay.
>> [inaudible]. >> Well that's not quite right.
I mean want does mean desire, but what else?
You evaded it. The question.
>> [inaudible]. >> You don't know this connotation.
Who knows this connotation? >> Lack.
>> Lack. We don't say that very often anymore.
It's a terrific use of want. And I charge all of you to go out there,
and starting using it this way. It, a lack, it isn't for want.
Are you wanting something? That doesn't mean, it means you're lacking
something. It isn't for lack of something to say,
something to tell you. Max, what does this mean?
It isn't [inaudible]. It's not.
>> It's, not that I am lacking something to tell you.
>> Exactly. >> I do have something to tell you.
>> It's, I have something to tell you. >> Right.
It's not for lack of something to say. >> Right.
>> I have something to tell you. I do have something I wanna say.
I do. But that's not the point?
It's not for want of something to say. It's not for something to tell, lack of
something to tell you, or something you should know.
Now we, Kristen, move to something else. It's not.
It's not because I don't have anything you should know.
That's, that's a step up from. >> Something to say.
What are, what's the distinction between having something to say, having something
to tell you, and having something you should know?
Those are three different variations. >> Yeah.
Well having something to say is just, you know.
It may be a speech that doesn't really matter.
And then having something to tell you, I have an urge to say something to you.
It's important that I tell, I have something that I need to get off my chest.
>> Tell. Tell.
Tell all. Confess.
>> And then something you should know makes it important for the listener as
well. So not only do I have an urge to confess
something to you but you really need to hear it because it's important for.
>> So it refers. The you, the reader, the listeners someone
less important. I've got something to say almost doesn't
matter. Who's receiving.
The second. You becomes important.
Telling isn't just telling, it's telling to us, the reader, the listener.
And then the third. What's the relationship of you should
know? Between the I and the U.
Emily. >> Think if it's just a, a new type of
urgency, a complete necessity. >> Hm.
>> Yes, but it presumes relationship. >> What kind of relationship does it
presume? >> Well, the, the, the speaker of the poem
has something that the other person needs or wants, or iii...
>> Needs. Well not wants, necessarily.
If you go into a history of the American south course, and you know nothing about
the history of the American south. And the lecturer says that this is
something you should know. It implies that the lecturer has something
that he or she knows that you don't. It implies that the lecturer is somebody,
and you aren't yet. [inaudible].
>> Implies that, that person has something to say and that you have, need to listen.
>> Should. >> There's a kind of finger wagging there.
But it's not! But see to say, it's not for that, it's
not. It's not that I lack something to say or
that I lack something to tell you or something you should know.
I have, I may have all that. But something else.
Molly, what? But something else, BUT turns the point.
>> But. >> He needs to say something to stop you
from going or stop the reader from reading.
>> Detain, translate that word. >> To...
To stop, to keep somebody here. >> It's a great work [inaudible].
Let's play with that a little more. >> Well also as used in, in terms of like
a prisoner. >> Detain has, has a valid [inaudible] of
ancient mariner. I have a story to tell you and grabs you
by [inaudible] beginning Moby-Dick. >> I've got some story to tell you.
I, I have to, I am the kind of person who has to detain you, to keep you from going.
Where would you go? Where, where would one go?
Kristen? >> To not be in the room with the poet or
to not be, ... >> What's the rules?
>> Not be present. Not be, not be present at all, maybe not
exist anymore. >> Not be present?
So what is Sid saying so far about what he needs and what he wants?
>> He needs the companionship. He needs someone to be with him.
[inaudible] ... >> He wants to detain you.
I want to detain you, to keep you from going.
It's not that I have something to say, though I do.
It's not that, it's not that I, I, I have, that there's something you should know,
although I think that's true. It's, it's not for those reasons, but just
to keep you here. So, we have [inaudible], which is, empty
out, the urgency of content, completely. What do we have left when we take content
out? >> Somebody could say form, and that's not
quite it. >> Just the feeling.
>> Touching, feeling. >> The feeling of feeling myself here.
>> Feeling? >> I think.
>> Well I think. >> [inaudible].
>> That's the other, that's the other important word, isn't it?
I mean we have it is the first important word, and here is the second.
>> Yes. >> So here I think, could be Dickenson's
this, or Whitman's now. And we talked about this [inaudible].
>> So what does that? >> [inaudible].
>> Have to do? >> This.
>> Okay. You're going along fast, as you usually
do, but what, what? When you get rid of the content.
It's not because I have content, it's not because I have a story to tell you It's
because I have a poem to write You were going too fast to the end.
>> But that's the matter. That's where it is.
>> Yeah. You're absolutely right.
>> [laugh] >> And I don't want to go out when it is here.
>> [laugh] >> So fast. What's left when you get rid of content?
Emily, what's left when you have a story? Your moms have something to tell you.
But it's not. It turns out to be not important.
It's really the weather. And you say, "Mom, why did you make me
come all the way home to talk about the weather?" ...
>> That's not what you have to. No, she says.
I didn't wanna tell you. It's not that I have something to tell
you. It's because I needed you here.
>> Just the, the presence of the listener? >> Presence, presence of what?
In your case, presence of daughter in the example that I made up.
>> The presence of the relationship between me and my mother.
>> Okay, and here? >> And here.
>> What is. >> Poet and reader.
>> Poet and reader. The relationship is poet and reader, so
now Anna, what does here mean? >> Well, when we thought about Dickensen's
for occupation this. >> This would refer to, open-endedly.
>> Open, but the writing of poetry ... >> To the thing we were reading.
>> And dwelling in the house of possibility which is what I think we
decided. >> So [inaudible] possibility is
open-endedness is all kinds of interpretations possible.
And when content is not that important. >> That's what you have, you have a lot of
presence. >> Who cares whether interpretation goes
this way or that way. But what we have is presence.
The presence, not just of the subject speaking, of the subject position of the
eye, of the speaker, of the narrator. But the, the required presence of you, of
one, of us, of readers, here. Okay, so, here, is hard.
It's tricky. >> Who wants to do here.
Really spell it out. Amaris where is here?
Where are we? >> In the space of the poem [inaudible].
>> In the space of the poem. And space is a fancy word that a lot of
fancy poetics people use to refer to the space the poem makes.
What is this space the poem makes? Its presence.
>> Using linguistic imagination or any motive thought of consciousness.
>> All that. >> Whitman's [inaudible] of voice maybe.
>> How about the words on the page right. I mean the, the, the.
Involvement. The presence of you in it.
This is all that Cid wants. It isn't for some, it isn't for, for want
of something to say, something to tell you, something you should know, but to
keep you here. To keep you in the poem.
Unfortunately, the poem's going to end, Cid Corman is going to end, but what will
be left of Cid Corman, he is deceased, what will be left of him is this.
Here. Something you should know, but to detain
you, to keep you from going. Dear Rear, I need you here.
This is why I write so you can be here, feeling my self here.
Oh. >> He says myself.
He doesn't say reader feeling you here. He says feeling myself here.
Have we misread this and misinterpreted it?
Kristen? >> Well, you can kind of take it to be
that the you in this poem is kind of like the you in [inaudible] poem, where it ends
up being actually me. So he might be talking about oneness being
with himself. >> So the, so that our reading,
[inaudible] our interpretation of this as the reader is wrong?
>> No, I think. >> [inaudible] >> Go ahead, Paulette.
>> I think we were right the first time because if we continue with the next line
and hes feeling himself here as you had there.
>> [inaudible] is you are. >> Right.
>> So, I, the writer, can only be here [inaudible].
>> I am only here. I am only in this poem, if you are.
If you, no one, this is the, you know? >> Tree falling.
>> Tree falling in the forest. If no one is reading the poem then Sid is
no longer present. So long as you are, so long as you are.
As, so long as you exist. So long as you are you.
So long as you are a subject, and this is a subject-subject relationship, not a
subject-object relationship. >> That's why he wanted.
>> [inaudible] >> That's why he's to repeat those last two lines, because he
went [inaudible]. >> First he emphasizes selfhood, then he
emphasizes. >> You, and then he emphasizes the
presence. >> First selfhood and then presence.
First selfhood and then existence. His existence is contingent on our
existence. >> And you can get that same emphasis if
you only had that line once, I don't think.
Even with the, the italics that is written.
I think you need that twice. So I find this as evocation of the
importance of the reader and a lessening of the importance of content.
Very moving. And it's hard to imagine such a slight
existential sufferential poem as being moving, but if anybody's with me, would
you like to take a ... >> A minute at the end here to say why?
Amorese, what's moving about this? >> I was very moved, because the emphasis
is on the encounter. And, I mean, if we take it briefly out of
the meta aspects we just discussed, it's just, it seems to be seeking to a very
simple longing for human connection, and being together, and sort of an intuitive
understanding. And so, you know, you could be with people
and still feel completely alone. But here, he's talking about a true
concentrated presence between poet and reader, which is the encounter and space
and connection of the poem. Yeah, and I think, as readers most, most
people I know who, who enjoy reading, they're, in a sense, they, they read in
the same way that Walt, William Carlos Williams smells.
It's not to learn anything particular, it's just to have experience where
experience is available. And, by that notion, content is to some
extent reducible or dispensable. And it really is just the moment of
reading and interacting with a person who is physically not there.
Which you take away and which you keep. >> I suppose.
>> So the purpose of art here is not to express the self.
This is not self expression. This is gonna be very important.
In the, postmodern. Poetry that we study, at the end of our
course. [inaudible] self expression in this case,
is not. It, it, it's there.
But it's not important. What's important is, connection.
Of meeting maker and receiver. And then a response back.
So as I said before, not subject-object. I am, you aren't; I know, you don't; I
have, you want; I speak, you listen. But subject to subject connection I exist
because you exist. I am present in the writing because you
are with me here. And without you, I am nothing.
So in the end, when Cid Corman feels himself here, it implies a you.
And I think, although Dickinson's, version of this is really very complicated.
Because she didn't have, really, an audience.
And she didn't, she was very anxious about publishing.
Nonetheless, her feeling herself there was predicated on some kind of you.
Sometimes, an imaginary lover, sometimes a hope for lover.
Sometimes a god, sometimes a reader. In this case Corman is, has a much more s,
obvious social impulse. But in the end, the, the language self
depends on the existence of someone to receive the message.
And it's not the message that's important. It's the fact of meeting to detain
someone, another human for contact.
