6.2. Economic value added (EVA) and Market value added (MVA) as investment criteria

Loading...

来自 Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology 的课程

Principles of Corporate Finance – A Tale of Value

5 个评分

Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology

Principles of Corporate Finance – A Tale of Value

5 个评分

课程 2（共 5 门，Specialization Understanding Modern Finance）

The study of Corporate Finance seems to be a very generic part of business education. Still, it either falls in the trap of intimidating formulas or is superficially journalistic. Both extremes preclude the understanding of the core finance ideas, concepts, and models. This Course is an attempt to avoid the above extremes. We discuss the core basis and mechanisms of modern corporate finance in a learner-friendly way. We will analyze the market’s most fundamental problems, realize the intrinsic interests and preferences of investors, reveal the true meaning of specific financial terms, and uncover important issues that are so often ignored in choosing and valuing investment projects. The learners will gain insight into the essence of corporate finance. They will be able to use the obtained knowledge and skills to successfully advance in their career at a financial institution, as well as in the area of financial management at non-financial businesses.

从本节课中

What We Learned About Finance. Some Conclusions. Corporate Finance and Career Tracks

In the first part of Week 6 we revisit the NPV criterion and compare it to two other very popular project assessment methods – economic value added (EVA) and market value added (MVA). Then we draw conclusions to the Course focusing on the project valuation road map and the role of options in valuation of projects and securities. We also address some major unanswered questions in corporate finance. The second part of Week 6 is devoted to the practical application of corporate finance. We discuss how the learners may profit from learning corporate finance. Then we describe popular career tracks in which the knowledge and skills obtained in the Course may prove instrumental for success. Those include sales and trading, analysis and research at a finance company, as well as financial management at a non-financial corporation.

6.1. The NPV criterion revisited8:23

6.2. Economic value added (EVA) and Market value added (MVA) as investment criteria6:47

6.3. The project valuation road map10:25

6.4. Options and their role in valuation7:04

6.5. Major unanswered questions in corporate finance9:10

6.6. How to profit from learning CF? Career track 1 – sales and trading6:11

6.7. How to profit from learning CF? Career track 2 – analysis and research. How to profit from learning CF? Career track 3 – financial management at a non-financial corporation5:47

与讲师见面

Konstantin Kontor
Director and Professor of Finance and Strategy
American Institute of Business and Economics (AIBEc)

Now a few words about EVA and MVA.

Well, the good news is that this is the final episode of

this course where I would put some formulas on the flip chart.

Now EVA or economic value added,

this was introduced sometime in

the 80s by one consulting company

and by definition it's the following thing, I will put the formula.

It's return on invested capital,

less weight to the average cost of capital,

times total assets, minus current liabilities,

I will put like this.

Oftentimes, this is sort of ignored.

But this has a special name,

this is called capital employed.

Now, if we equal the total assets,

times return on invested capital,

this is actually, roughly speaking, the profits of the company.

Well, to be more accurate,

this is net operating profit after taxes.

And then, we come up with

the general idea of that will allow us to see the meaning of that,

the PVA is actually again this is ROIC less UEC times this what is called,

I will put capital.

Now, look at this,

so this is how much we earn on our assets,

this is how much our sources of capital are worth.

So basically, you're talking about operating more efficiently,

and creating a greater return than the cost of capital.

So this is a very clear idea.

So, if you use your assets so as to not only

cover your cost of capital but also to squeeze some more return out of that,

then you create value.

So, the meaning here is that we have

to earn more than

weighted average cost of capital,

a very clear and I would say straightforward criteria.

And, now you can see why it is widely used in the corporate world,

because, this is the sort of periodic thing,

let's say may be a quarterly thing, annual thing,

and over this period of time,

that sort of it fixes a label.

We worked nicely, and that results in the idea of creating KPIs and therefore,

it's easy to evaluate performance.

Now the bad news about PVA,

is that it's sort of a periodic thing,

so it is not cumulative,

and it clearly does not recognize growth,

namely, the present value of growth opportunities.

So, it is sort of,

I wouldn't say it's a snapshot because it actually covers some period,

but this is a short-term measure.

And being a short-term measure,

it's both a plus and the minus.

A plus is because you can easily correct your performance if for example,

for this period your EVA happens to be negative,

but on the other hand,

you have to sometimes engage in

decisions that do result in negative EVAs over some period of time,

but, the compensation will be the sort of arriving value from the future.

Now, the market value added is another thing.

And market value added is basically, by definition,

is the market value of equity,

plus the market value of debt,

less the PVA of all investments.

So here, you can see that there's a very,

very close to the idea of PVA and NPV.

And we can rewrite that,

that actually market value added is,

first of all, this is PV of all EVAs,

and this is the NPV of all free cash flows.

So basically, well, this is just the sum over T of EVA,

T over one plus the discount by UEC.

So basically, we can see that the good news about MVA is that,

it does recognise PVGO,

and this is cumulative.

So, that basically answers the question,

how much value we have created over some period of time?

And this is sort of at a longer-term view.

Now, I specifically mentioned before

that these are the ones that are widely used in the corporate world,

but, you do understand that these are just other faces of MPV.

If EVA is sort of periodic,

these formulas like that MVA is equal to NPV of free cash flows,

that just says that we're talking about one and the same major approach.

So, here we get some support to

the idea that our obsession with the use of MPV had some roots here.

It is the thing that is widely used even in corporations.

I mentioned in the previous episode,

that sometimes the direct use of MPV formulas may look somewhat cumbersome but,

these are the ways how people feel that much better but in essence, it's the same.

So now, we are comfortable to wrap this up by saying that

we will indeed use MPV as often and as possible,

and everywhere that we will try to do that as best as we can.

Because we know that as we mentioned before,

to properly use MPV,

you have to always watch the quality of your inputs.

Now here I am wrapping up with MPV,

and in the next episode,

I will try to show the steps in project valuation as we have covered them in this course.

That is sort of a reminder or let's say a collection of

these steps so that will make the use of that easier for you

if you will have the time only to see the next episode.

探索我们的目录

免费加入并获得个性化推荐、更新和优惠。

Coursera 致力于普及全世界最好的教育，它与全球一流大学和机构合作提供在线课程。

© 2019 Coursera Inc. 保留所有权利。

通过 App Store 下载

通过 Google Play 获取