6.3. The project valuation road map

Loading...

来自 Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology 的课程

Principles of Corporate Finance – A Tale of Value

2 个评分

Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology

Principles of Corporate Finance – A Tale of Value

2 个评分

课程 2（共 5 门，Specialization Understanding Modern Finance）

The study of Corporate Finance seems to be a very generic part of business education. Still, it either falls in the trap of intimidating formulas or is superficially journalistic. Both extremes preclude the understanding of the core finance ideas, concepts, and models. This Course is an attempt to avoid the above extremes. We discuss the core basis and mechanisms of modern corporate finance in a learner-friendly way. We will analyze the market’s most fundamental problems, realize the intrinsic interests and preferences of investors, reveal the true meaning of specific financial terms, and uncover important issues that are so often ignored in choosing and valuing investment projects. The learners will gain insight into the essence of corporate finance. They will be able to use the obtained knowledge and skills to successfully advance in their career at a financial institution, as well as in the area of financial management at non-financial businesses.

从本节课中

What We Learned About Finance. Some Conclusions. Corporate Finance and Career Tracks

In the first part of Week 6 we revisit the NPV criterion and compare it to two other very popular project assessment methods – economic value added (EVA) and market value added (MVA). Then we draw conclusions to the Course focusing on the project valuation road map and the role of options in valuation of projects and securities. We also address some major unanswered questions in corporate finance. The second part of Week 6 is devoted to the practical application of corporate finance. We discuss how the learners may profit from learning corporate finance. Then we describe popular career tracks in which the knowledge and skills obtained in the Course may prove instrumental for success. Those include sales and trading, analysis and research at a finance company, as well as financial management at a non-financial corporation.

6.1. The NPV criterion revisited8:23

6.2. Economic value added (EVA) and Market value added (MVA) as investment criteria6:47

6.3. The project valuation road map10:25

6.4. Options and their role in valuation7:04

6.5. Major unanswered questions in corporate finance9:10

6.6. How to profit from learning CF? Career track 1 – sales and trading6:11

6.7. How to profit from learning CF? Career track 2 – analysis and research. How to profit from learning CF? Career track 3 – financial management at a non-financial corporation5:47

与讲师见面

Konstantin Kontor
Director and Professor of Finance and Strategy
American Institute of Business and Economics (AIBEc)

Now let's recall what we have to do when we try to value an investment project.

So here I will put some steps that we talked,

about that we applied and saw examples.

Now is just the time to put them together.

So, I put like steps in project valuation.

Well, the first group of steps clearly deals with

determining cash flows because

remember that we sort of agreed to always,

whenever possible, use the NPV approach,

therefore we need some numerators,

namely cash flows and then later the nominators that will be on the next list.

Those will be discount rate.

So what do we have to keep in mind about these cash flows?

First of all, we use past data as a basis.

Well, again if applicable,

because if you are talking about the greenfield project then there is little past data.

Obviously, you can find some similar projects and then try to

compare with them but that is just a basis and not always the best basis.

But if you do have this information,

if you do have the story of the company or other projects,

then you can draw some conclusions from that.

Now, the next thing here clearly,

this is the forecasts.

And these forecasts may be at the level of a company,

at the level of the industry,

at the level of the economy,

at the level of the world economy if you will.

Now, here I would specify that you don't have to be

overwhelmed with the idea to go from the trends in

the global economy down to the trends in the national economy,

down to the trends in the industry because unfortunately,

if you start so far away,

then the quality of the result will be very low.

You will have a hugely wide range of these forecasts that will

not help you to narrow this down to any meaningful valuation.

Now, the next thing is that both past data and forecasts,

they have to be based on something that is extracted

from the company financial statements.

Well, we study exactly what people extract in greater detail in our next course that is

devoted to issues in accounting that are pertinent

to project valuation both in financial accounting and in cost accounting.

But for now I'm just saying that the financial statements of the company,

this is the source from which normally we take some initial inputs to later

build the models and then use the NPV to evaluate these models.

And then, another thing that deals with determining cash flows here,

then I will specify that.

You have to clearly differentiate between,

I would say the clear differentiative cost.

So here here sunk costs,

you ignore, then opportunity costs you do take into account.

Then also you have to deal with

overhead allocation and the final thing,

again this is sort of an accounting issue,

then you have to deal with relevant costs.

And all that is easier said than done because not only do we devote

the whole big portion of the next course to these important issues but in reality,

especially if you are not in the area of greenfield project,

if you're operating a company with some history,

with some preferences, this is actually not such an easy thing.

So you just have to keep this in mind and then the major idea is not to commit

significant mistakes and if at all possible then to

try to be as correct and as close to reality as you can.

So this is the first group of steps that are dealing with cash flows.

Now the next thing, as I mentioned,

this is the discount rates.

Well, remember we had

a very detailed example when we

calculated the weighted average cost of capital in beta

of a company with several divisions.

So here you can say,

we start with traded competitors

and from here we arrive at weighted average cost of capital.

So this is the approach that is used for

practical reasons and for practical goals in reality,

so that's what people do.

Now, unfortunately that is not always realistic when you talk about

securities and also derivatives because

here you can see that r's may

be stochastic and even path dependent.

So unfortunately, here we will put a big,

both exclamation and interrogatory mark

because if this is the area in which you do have to

use advanced mathematical models but that is

fortunately not the area of most real life projects.

So if you specialize in securities valuation then you clearly have to

be more advanced in math and then you will use some models.

Again, the logic there is the same.

You will always see that NPV will keep popping up in all these models.

But in order to come up with some realistic results,

you will have to be somewhat more detailed.

Now, here I'd like to wrap up because

about options and some other things I will stock

in the next episode because that is worth it.

But for now I can say that whenever,

in a real project valuation,

you see some challenges that something becomes

progressively hard to understand and progressively messy,

now I would say there are at least two major recommendations.

One is this abbreviation KISS, Keep It Simple Stupid.

Well, here often times this is used in presentations or so but by the same token here.

Remember that most investors,

they do not have time to go deeper in that.

Even if you are dealing with,

let's say, advanced securities valuation,

you place these balances,

this cash to a company that actually does this management.

If they do that great,

then you keep it.

If they lose your money,

then you withdraw your money.

But the idea is that a client is rarely

in the position and in the ability to understand what these people are doing.

They somewhat explain that that might be a problem that might create a certain wall of

misunderstanding or a veil of

unobservability if we used our buzzwords from the capital market scores.

But this is reality.

And the final thing that is the most important,

I would say be realistic.

If, for example, you make some assumptions and these assumptions are,

in order to sort of be able to

calculate something but these assumptions are far from reality, don't make them.

If sometimes you cannot, in an easy,

in an understandable way,

value something then just keep this in mind,

you can pronounce that to the people who are stakeholders in this story.

But you don't have to pretend that you know how to do it.

You are better off if you said,

"Well, this is somewhat a messy thing

because otherwise if you don't pay any attention to that, this is a blunder."

But if you try to,

let's say look smarter than you are,

or make your project look better than it is,

that might be a much worse option

and that may result in significant problems in the future.

So these are the major steps in

project valuation until we reached the potential options stage.

In the next episode we will talk about options once again,

not in that detail that we used last week but to have some wrap up here too.

探索我们的目录

免费加入并获得个性化推荐、更新和优惠。

Coursera 致力于普及全世界最好的教育，它与全球一流大学和机构合作提供在线课程。

© 2018 Coursera Inc. 保留所有权利。

通过 App Store 下载

通过 Google Play 获取