I hope that what they'll find useful and important about our education, our program here, is that it will help them develop the knowledge and skills to be the effective leaders that they, that they want to be. Being an effective leader and an ethical leader involves a variety of knowledge and skill sets. They have to have certain analytic skills to provide a rigorous and data based analysis of public policy. But policy doesn't sell itself. They also have to know how to be advocates. They need to know how to negotiate, how to build coalitions, how to forge compromise. How to frame their policies to make them persuasive. And, of course, the have to know something about a specific area of policy. Maybe not one that they'll work on forever, but they have to develop the confidence that they can master a policy issue to a certain degree. So those are the kinds of knowledge and skill sets that we think are very, very important, very useful for students who want to, as so many of them say, change the world. That's why we think we're an attractive choice for both undergraduate and graduate students. I think the advantage of having more people know more about China, without necessarily becoming China specialists. Who have learned the language, but having a good basic understanding of the country and knowledge is really important. Because we are in some sense, in essence, a democracy. And therefore it really matters what our people think. And that was the whole, sort of, orientation of Thomas Jefferson, he believed that if you're going to have a successful democracy you need an educated populace. I think he was thinking in very general terms, but I think if we also look at specific problems and issues. The more people know, the more they know, the more balanced and comprehensive their view, the better decisions we're going to be able to make. So, I come at it from that perspective. We need a relatively small number of really deeply knowledgeable people about China. But we also need a much larger number, maybe even to say nearly everybody who knows something about China and knows something that is useful, balanced, objective. So the more people who know that, I think the better off we will be and the more stable our relationship with China will be. I think, of course, the major theme may be the one big thing and then the one more detailed thing. The one big thing is, this is and is going to continue to be a complex relationship and, therefore, beware of simple scenarios. A new Cold War, a coming conflict, a G2, a cooperative, our partnership with China is going to be more complicated than that. But then, going one level down, I tried to open up each of those sort of boxes of type of relationship and to ask the next question. Okay, it's going to be competitive, but what kind of competition? Is that is competition a bad thing? It is in some areas. It is beneficial in others, but you have to have rules in either case. So to go beyond the simple question, what pure kind of relationship is it going to be? And even beyond the next question, which is, what blend is it going to be? But then, to go one level even deeper down and to say what kind of cooperation conflict or confrontation or antagonism cooperation. What kinds of relationships are we going to have?