Harry Harding discusses the Cooperative Aspects of US-China Relations

Loading...

来自 University of Virginia 的课程

21 世纪的公共政策挑战

471 个评分

University of Virginia

21 世纪的公共政策挑战

471 个评分

This course introduces class participants to the political significance and societal consequences of challenges facing U.S. and international policymakers. It is designed to help participants develop skills to analyze policy proposals and advocate for their preferred options for issues on the public policy agenda ahead. The class assumes basic knowledge about governing institutions and democratic processes, while recommending supplemental materials for further study to complement reading links provided. The course focuses on future policy challenges, while examining the broad historical context in which policies are adopted and implemented. As the course evaluates how issues are advanced by private sector interests, non-governmental organizations, and government policymakers, it examines how groups become effective policy advocates. Particular attention is paid to how winning coalitions are formed and how issue framing shapes the outcome of policy campaigns. The goal is neither to produce partisan talking points, nor to favor one governance philosophy over others. Rather it is to clarify the public policy challenges ahead and to enhance participants’ understanding of how policy options are adopted in the real world arena of contemporary politics. Coming soon, you will be able to join Signature Track, a system that verifies your identity when you take an exam. This option will allow you to earn a Verified Certificate, which provides formal recognition of your achievements in the course and includes the University of Virginia logo. Before then, you can complete a “test run” of the exam. You can then re-take the exam after the Verified Certificate becomes available. For information regarding Verified Certificates, see https://courserahelp.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/201212399-Verified-Certificates"

从本节课中

US-China Relations

Professor Harry Harding details the complex, all-important relationship between the U.S. and China, outlining different scenarios for future competition and cooperation.

Student introduction to Harry Harding lecture on US-China Relations1:02

Gerry Warburg introduction to Harry Harding: Managing the US-China Relationship3:15

Harry Harding and the Importance of US-China Relations4:28

Harry Harding discusses the Cooperative Aspects of US-China Relations6:37

Harry Harding discusses the Competitive Aspects of US-China Relations13:40

Harry Harding discusses the Conflict Aspects of the US-China Relations7:20

Harry Harding summarizing the Competitive and Antagonistic Aspects of US-China Relations4:39

Harry Harding answers UVa Student Questions11:45

Gerry Warburg and Harry Harding Post Lecture Discussions3:45

与讲师见面

Professor Gerry Warburg
Professor of Public Policy, Assistant Dean for External Affairs
Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy

Let's begin with the cooperative aspects of the relationship.

There are numerous areas in which the Unites States and

China acknowledge shared interests, and acknowledge the benefit of cooperation.

The threat of terrorism, the instability on the Korean peninsula, the desire for

a stable and prosperous international economy, and

a growing concern with climate change, are major examples.

But cooperation in pursuit of these objectives frequently seems to

fall short of the ideal.

In fact, mutual dissatisfaction with each other's performance, in advancing

supposedly common interests, is a regular theme in the US China relationship.

One of the clearest examples of this problem involves North Korea.

China and the US both say, that they seek the denuclearization of

the Korean Peninsula, and oppose North Korea's development and

deployment of ballistic wi, missiles and nuclear weapons.

But the US accuses China of not using all possible leverage in pursuit of those

objectives, of not imposing tough enough sanctions against Pyongyang, or

not being sufficiently and openly critical of North Korea's transgressions.

China, on the other hand, insists that its seeming reluctance is justified.

It argues that economic sanctions are unlikely to be effective,

unless they are so severe as to threaten the collapse of the North Korean economy.

And in that case, Beijing points out,

China would face much higher costs and risks, than with the United States.

A collapsing North Korean economy would generate large flows of

refugees from Korea into northeast China, a part of

the country that does not have the capacity to absorb and accommodate them.

It would also raise the question of the future of North Korea's

nuclear weapons arsenal.

So why can cooperations who advance common interests produce dissatisfaction and

indeed argument, rather than strengthen a relationship?

One problem particularly evident in the case of Korea, is that Chinese and

American interests on key international issues, while overlapping and

complementary, are not identical.

[COUGH].

In particular, with regard to Korea, China and the United States define the seemingly

common goal maintain stability on the peninsula very differently.

To the US stability means preventing the outbreak of another Korean war, and

preventing North Korea from deploying or exporting weapons of mass destruction.

To China those goals are not unimportant, but

they are less important than preventing the collapse of the North Korean regime,

and that goal is far more important to Beijing than to Washington.

In other words both countries use the same term stability to define their interest,

their interests therefore, appear to be common.

But if we look more carefully at what they mean by stability,

we see that they mean different things for different reasons, and

that obviously complicates their cooperation.

Well not so evident in the Korean situation.

There are other factors that, past and

present, have obstructed cooperation between China and the United States.

One is the cost involved, cooperation involves a variety of costs for

both parties that they would prefer not to pay or at least to minimize.

Sometimes a country is not eager to be seen as cooperating with another,

because of its differences on other issues, or

because cooperation might complicate its relations with third parties.

When American and Chinese leaders started talking about building what

they then called a constructive strategic partnership in the 1990s,

strong objections were raised by Japan, which feared that

a closer US-China relationship, especially if it used the word strategic,

would come at the expense of its military alliance with the United States.

Another cause stems from the fact that cooperation requires the dedication of

resources to achieve a common objective, that not only raises the question

of the distribution of costs and benefits among the collaborating parties, but

can also require a degree of transparency about resources and

leverage that one or both countries may prefer not to give.

Yet another potential cost is the lost,

the loss of autonomy and the acknowledgment of dependence,

that an agreement to cooperate can entail and imply.

Even at the height of the US-China United Front, as it was called, against

the Soviet Union in the 1970's, this attitude was evident on the Chinese side.

As Henry Kissinger has summarized the Chinese approach, Chinese leaders

consistently denied that it needed or even wanted protection against Moscow,

even they sought cooperation against Soviet expansion in Asia.

According to Kissinger,

Mao described the two countries as acting hand in hand in dealing with Moscow.

But his comments strongly implied that in reality the two countries coordination,

would be conducted more at arms length.

Now consider it a concern with all of these different cost is understandable.

But in the case of the US-China relationship,

China's seeming reluctance to cooperate fully with the United States,

has given it the reputation of being, if not a free rider,

at least what one colleague of mine has recently called a cheap rider,

trying to get the benefits of cooperation at the lowest possible cost.

That perception can give rise to a level of mistrust, that can not

only reduce the prospects for cooperation on the particular issue in question, but

can spread to and in some sense poison other aspects of the relationship as well.

So while China and the US are likely to continue to cooperate in coming decades,

much will depend on whether that cooperation is open and

enthusiastic, or hidden and grudging.

And on whether each side is satisfied with regard to the costs and

benefits of that cooperation whether they are shared equitably.

探索我们的目录

免费加入并获得个性化推荐、更新和优惠。

Coursera 致力于普及全世界最好的教育，它与全球一流大学和机构合作提供在线课程。

© 2018 Coursera Inc. 保留所有权利。

通过 App Store 下载

通过 Google Play 获取