Explore
For Enterprise
Join for Free
Log In

艺术与人文
商务
计算机科学
数据科学
信息技术
健康
数学和逻辑
个人发展
物理科学与工程
社会科学
语言学习
学位
证书

浏览 Coursera 的全部课程

浏览
搜索
企业版
登录
免费加入

2.8 Qualitative sources

Loading...

Social Science Approaches to the Study of Chinese Society Part 2

香港科技大学

4.4（10 个评分） | 754 名学生已注册

This course is intended as a first step for learners who seek to become producers of social science research. It is organized as an introduction to the design and execution of a research study. It introduces the key elements of a proposal for a research study, and explains the role of each. It reviews the major types of qualitative and quantitative data used in social science research, and then introduces some of the most important sources of existing data available freely or by application, worldwide and for China. The course offers an overview of basic principles in the design of surveys, including a brief introduction to sampling. Basic techniques for quantitative analysis are also introduced, along with a review of common challenges that arise in the interpretation of results. Professional and ethical issues that often arise in the conduct of research are also discussed. The course concludes with an introduction to the options for further study available to the interested student, and an overview of the key steps involved in selecting postgraduate programs and applying for admission. Learners who complete the course will be able to make an informed decision about whether to pursue advanced studies, and should be adequately prepared to write an application for postgraduate study that exhibits basic understanding of key aspects of social science research paradigms and methodologies. Explore the big questions in social science and learn how you can be a producer of social science research. Course Overview video: https://youtu.be/QuMOAlwhpvU Part 1 should be completed before taking this course: https://www.coursera.org/learn/social-science-study-chinese-society

查看授课大纲

审阅

4.4（10 个评分）

5 stars
7 ratings
4 stars
1 ratings
3 stars
1 ratings
2 stars
1 ratings

从本节课中

Evidence

Week 2 will discuss the kind sources social scientists use for research. By the end of this week, you should be able to identify some of these major sources and perhaps pinpoint some sources that can be used in your own study.

2.1 Evidence3:00

2.2 Survey data12:21

2.3 Public data10:12

2.4. Administrative and archival microdata12:38

2.5. Multi-generational microdata11:21

2.6 Aggregated data12:40

2.7 Sources of aggregated data7:44

2.8 Qualitative sources13:53

2.9 New sources11:21

2.10 Summary2:27

教学方

Cameron Campbell
Professor of Social Science

脚本

[MUSIC]

Hi. In this module,

I'm going to talk about the sources for qualitative research.

One of the most long standing sources for conducting qualitative research,

indeed going back into the 19th century has been official documents.

Historical and comparative research relies

heavily on official documents held in archives.

I'll give some examples of the topics of this research in just a bit.

This is especially the case in sociology and political science where people

conducting qualitative research on things like social movements.

On historical and comparative topics, make use again of official documents.

These documents may include reports, meeting records and

other official documents that provide insight into the deliberations and

the negotiations of government officials and

other elites, especially as it regards to policy.

Now, one of the limitations of official documents is that they represent a view

from above.

They were compiled by elites, official-dom, and

quite often their perspective that they have is one from above.

And when these documents report on the population that was being administered,

they may not be entirely reliable, and we have to look for

others sources for those topics.

But if you're planning to use documents,

official documents, to study elites, then there's a less of a problem.

But again, you need to be careful making use of official documents to try to

understand grassroots phenomena.

Because again, you're getting an elite perspective that may not be essentially

realistic when it comes to talk about what's going on among, you might say

the common people, the people down in the working classes, and so forth.

Now I'd like to provide some examples of research questions that often make use

official documents as well as archival documents more broadly.

A classic topic in which the use of archival documents especially

official documents is especially common is in the study of international relations.

So when we think about the study of the formation of alliances,

the writing of treaties, the process of going to war,

decisions about participating in agreement, these studies almost always

make use of some sorts of official documents that record the deliberations

of elites or interactions of officials between different countries.

The study of social and political movements often makes use of,

if not official documents then at least archival documents.

So quite often when we think about especially historical social and

political movements, the leaders of these movements typically leave behind a rich

trove of correspondence, meeting minutes, and other documents that are archived.

And then which provide an important perspective

from the leaders of these movements about the goals of these movements,

the strategies, and their outcomes.

Then there's policymaking, research on the origins of

policies of course makes use of official documents and other archival documents.

So, as we're trying to understand the deliberations, the calculations,

the negotiations that go into the formation of policy

within a national government, official documents, minutes of meetings, and

other correspondence, and so forth, all play an important role.

Another big source for

qualitative research is diaries, letter, and other private sources.

So, these diaries, letters, and other private sources are very useful for

what we referred to as history from below.

That it the study of, you might say, the common people,

that is the people who are not elites.

They are especially valuable for historical research, for

studying populations in the past that we have no way of interviewing or

approaching through other methods or through other data.

They often provide understanding of meanings,

motivations, understandings of social and

cultural phenomena of changes that are taking place.

I'll give some examples in just a moment.

They help us to understand how people understood and

contributed to social and political change that may have taking place around them.

Now, caveat is that even though we may think of diaries, letters and

other private sources as a tool for conducting a history from below,

there's a limitation that many populations in the past where education was uncommon.

In those populations, only the elite may have been able to write and

leave diaries and letters, and other documents behind.

So now I'd like to talk about some of the research questions that are often

addressed by making use of these private sources.

One again is understanding social and political change.

How did people understand, respond to, contribute to the social and

political transformations that are going on around them?

So, in diaries and letters, people often reflect on, talk about what's going on

in their daily lives, how different kinds of social changes are affecting them.

So this gives us a window into the way that

people were thinking about these changes in past times,

people that we don't have the opportunity to interview now.

Another big area for applying the analysis of these sorts of private sources

is understanding race, gender, ethnicity, and understanding how the members

of marginalized groups experienced and negotiated their situations.

So when we look at groups that were discriminated against or

marginalized in the past or unfortunately sometimes even in the present,

things like diaries and letters give us insight into how they experienced

the pressures, the stresses, the constraints.

But face them in their daily lives and then how they

sought to negotiate around these pressures and these constraints.

Finally, there's relationships.

That is understanding how people in different contexts

related to each other and related to institutions.

So people look at letters written to government agencies, to political leaders,

as well as letters written by people one to another to understand how they formed

connections with each other, what sorts of expectations they had of each other.

Another source of qualitative data is interviews and focus groups.

So open-ended interviews and focus groups yield insights into how individuals

understand and react to contemporary topics and issues.

Such data yield insight into their meanings,

their motivations, how they understand the world around them,

information that's not typically available in a quantitative study.

Now, most such data is collected by the researcher, him or

herself even though data from interviews and

focus groups is typically preserved, it's still uncommon for

people to conduct secondary analysis of these preserved data.

So if you're going to make use of interviews or focus groups,

you're probably going to have to collect the data yourself.

Some examples so, meanings.

How do people understand features of the social world in which they are embedded?

Motivations, why do people do what they do?

For example in a study of fertility behavior,

people maybe asked in interviews or focus groups to talk about

why they have particular fertility preferences for having more children, for

having fewer children and so forth, to explain this in their own words.

And then to get people to talk about their strategies.

How do they go about achieving their goals, and defining those goals?

Finally, there's ethnography.

Ethnography yields insights into the norms, the values,

the practices of specific social groups.

This typically involves immersion into specific social groups and

intense observation of interactions and behavior.

This may yield insights that are not available from simple or

straightforward interviews and focus groups because in an ethnography,

people are being observed in a natural setting.

In recent years, people have paid more and

more attention to the fact that the observer,

the ethnographer has a relationship to the people he or she is observing.

So in decades past, the ethnographer often thought of him or

herself as a dispassionate observer like a scientist looking through

a microscope at a collection of bacteria on a petri dish.

We now realized that that's an incorrect distinction that the ethnographer actually

interacts with the people that he or she is observing, and may influence them.

So, there's a lot more attention to this self-reflexive process in

ethnography nowadays.

Finally, as with interviews and focus groups, even though ethnographic data is

preserved, most of the time, secondary analysis of ethnographic data is rare.

Most people go out and

collect their own data if they're conducting an ethnographic analysis.

Some examples of topics that are studied through ethnography.

Studies of neighborhoods and communities rely heavily on ethnography.

The basic question being how how do communities,

how do neighborhoods structure themselves, organize themselves?

How do they keep themselves together in the face of various challenges

from outside?

Subcultures, so there's a lot of interest in understanding specific subcultures,

whether it's the members of particular professions,

members of religious groups, people with particular hobbies.

How do these groups distinguish themselves and sustain themselves and

essentially turn interested people into members of their groups?

How do they sanction particular behaviors or punish others?

Organizations, so how do organizations including firms and

government agencies, how do they maintain themselves and pursue their interest?

Social movements, so how do movements of various sorts, social movements, political

movements, how do they define their goals, achieve them, and respond to challenges?

A final approach, or a final source,

within qualitative research is content analysis.

So this is the content, the meaning, the motivation, intended audience and

consequence of texts.

When we say texts we do so with a very broad definition.

Texts may be written text, they maybe oral recordings,

they maybe visual or other media.

This differs from qualitative approaches and

that the content of the text is itself the object of study.

Conversation analysis which is one part of content analysis

examines the interactions embedded within conversations.

And one of the key features of content analysis is that,

the results are supposed to be reproducible that different people

looking at the same records, the same transcripts of

a piece of content should hopefully come to the same conclusions.

Some examples.

So in politics, people conduct content analyses of political party platforms,

political speeches, to try to understand what sorts of signals candidates or

parties are trying to send.

And trying to understand who their intended audience is.

Media, people conduct content analysis to understand how different issues,

how different people's, how different groups are represented in the media.

Interactions, how do people navigate interactions with each other,

communicate with each other and react to information?

Finally, reactions.

When people are discussing phenomenon, are experiencing phenomenon, perhaps

an illness, perhaps some other unexpected events, how do they describe those events?

How do they essentially process them,

how do they categorize events by attaching particular meanings to them?

And this is again done with content analysis.

So this has been a very brief introduction to qualitative sources,

in fact qualitative researches extremely diverse and

training will require extensive study and

there are sources beyond the once that I've talked about here.

Hopefully though, I've given some taste of what the key sources are for

conducting qualitative research.

探索我们的目录

免费加入并获得个性化推荐、更新和优惠。

Coursera 致力于普及全世界最好的教育，它与全球一流大学和机构合作提供在线课程。

© 2019 Coursera Inc. 保留所有权利。

通过 App Store 下载

通过 Google Play 获取

Coursera
关于
管理团队
工作机会
目录
证书
MasterTrack™ 证书
学位
企业版
政府版

社区
Learners
Partners
Developers
Beta Testers
Translators

连接
博客
Facebook
领英
Twitter
Instagram
YouTube
技术博客

更多
条款
隐私
帮助
内容访问
媒体
联系我们
目录
附属公司