The "Corn Wars" and Theory of Ricardian Rents; Property Rights

Loading...

来自 University of California, Irvine 的课程

Strategic Business Management - Microeconomics

14 个评分

University of California, Irvine

Strategic Business Management - Microeconomics

14 个评分

This course weds business strategy with the principles of microeconomics. It offers valuable a powerful toolbox together with cases and lessons across all major functions of business, management, from finance, operations management, and marketing to human resource management, organizational behavior, statistics, and, of course, business strategy.

从本节课中

Land, Labor, and Organizational Behavior

The Big Questions; Key Concepts of Organizational Behavior9:30

The Wage Rate, Unions, and Monopsony4:35

The Derived Demand for Labor; The Marginal Productivity Theory of Resource Demand; The Profit Maximizing Rule; MRC=MRP11:23

Wages and Productivity; Wages and Product Prices; The Backward Bending Curve5:09

Wages in Imperfectly Competitive Labor Markets; Company Town Monopsony; Labor Union Monopoly6:54

Factors Affecting Wage Differentials; Compensating Differentials; Quasi-rents; Human Capital5:32

How Land is Priced; Rent Versus Economic Rent5:13

The "Corn Wars" and Theory of Ricardian Rents; Property Rights5:25

Henry George’s Land Tax; Tax Incidence Analysis8:26

Determinants of the Price of Land and Rents; Rent Seeking7:53

与讲师见面

Dr. Peter Navarro
Professor
Paul Merage School of Business

[MUSIC]

Thus far in our examination of land as a factor of production, we have defined pure

economic rent and shown it to be different from the rent you pay a landlord.

We've also shown that land rents are determined by the interaction of supply

and demand, just as in other markets.

In this module, and to truly understand what distinguishes land from most other

factors of production, we'll get back into our time machine, always a fun prospect.

And travel back to two controversies in 19th century history.

The Corn Wars in England and the Single Tax Movement in America.

[MUSIC]

The most common explanation at the time was this.

Landlords were raising the rent they were charging farmers for

the use of their land.

This rent gouging by landlords, in turn, forced farmers to raise the price of corn.

So in this scenario, landlords were the clear villains.

However, one of the great classical economists,

David Ricardo, had a very different explanation.

Ricardo said that the price of corn is not high because the rent is paid.

Rather rent is high because the price of corn is high.

In this scenario, the root cause of the problem was increased demand for

corn which, in turn, was driving up rent for corn land.

These figures illustrate this great Corn Wars debate.

In the left-hand figure, we have the market for acres of corn land

[MUSIC]

In the right-hand figure, we have the market for corn.

The corn controversy was based on the assumption that rising land rents would in

turn lead to an upward shift of the corn supply curve in the right-hand figure.

Making landlords to blame for high food prices.

But what's wrong with this picture?

Let's pause the presentation now so

you can try to solve this interesting Ricardian riddle.

[MUSIC]

Well as David Ricardo pointed out, and as we have previously learned,

supply decisions are based on marginal cost, not fixed costs,

such as the cost of land.

Instead, Ricardo envisioned the following chain of causality.

In the left-hand figure we have the corn market.

In this market, there might be an increase in demand as the English population grew.

As demand shifts upward and outward from D1 to D2, price

increases from P1 to P2, and quantity increases from Q1 to Q2.

This, in turn, would increase the demand for land, from D1 to D2.

And rents would rise from R1 to R2.

[SOUND] Now look at what we've just done.

We've illustrated that an increase in price in the product market,

in this case corn, results in an increase in the price of

the factor of production, in this case land.

Of course, looking at this result, one might still conclude that

landlords are unfairly benefiting from the situation.

After all, these landlords would be just as willing to rent

all of their land at a rent of R2 as they are at R1.

However at the higher rent they appear to be enjoying an unearned profit or

windfall profit.

In fact, that is precisely the conclusion reached by someone a continent away

in a similar situation.

That person was the journalist Henry George.

The time and place was the 19th century America.

And the debate was over the so-called Single Tax Movement,

the subject of our next module.

[MUSIC]

探索我们的目录

免费加入并获得个性化推荐、更新和优惠。

Coursera 致力于普及全世界最好的教育，它与全球一流大学和机构合作提供在线课程。

© 2018 Coursera Inc. 保留所有权利。

通过 App Store 下载

通过 Google Play 获取