Explore
For Enterprise
Join for Free
Log In

艺术与人文
商务
计算机科学
数据科学
信息技术
健康
数学和逻辑
个人发展
物理科学与工程
社会科学
语言学习
学位
证书

浏览 Coursera 的全部课程

浏览
搜索
企业版
登录
免费加入

Video 5.3: Exercise on Health vs. Non-Health Benefits for Households With Water Sources Outside the Home

Loading...

Water Supply and Sanitation Policy in Developing Countries Part 1: Understanding Complex Problems

曼彻斯特大学

4.5（98 个评分） | 6.7K 名学生已注册

This course will examine current conditions and trends in water and sanitation services in low and middle income countries. Within it we will take a critical look at the underlying political, economic, social, and technical reasons why almost a billion people lack access to improved water supplies and almost 2 billion still do not have improved sanitation services.

查看授课大纲

审阅

4.5（98 个评分）

5 stars
64 ratings
4 stars
25 ratings
3 stars
9 ratings

JB

Apr 08, 2018

all good content, though the formatting in the submission box limited, would prefer to just submit PDFs. Other than that, I got a lot out of it. .\n\nThanks

QK

Mar 07, 2019

Very useful, I understood how governments and private agencies works positively and negatively for water and sanitation projects.

从本节课中

Exploring Health Benefits and Climate Change Issues

Video 5.1: Facts About Water and Health13:47

Video 5.2: Estimating the Economic Value of Health Benefits12:10

Video 5.3: Exercise on Health vs. Non-Health Benefits for Households With Water Sources Outside the Home5:04

Video 5.4: Climate Change, Water and Health14:02

Video 5.5: Effects of Climate Change on Water Utilities16:00

Video 5.6: Conversation with Clive Agnew16:56

教学方

Prof Dale Whittington
Professor
Dr Duncan Thomas
Lecturer

脚本

[BLANK_AUDIO]

In this video we're going to go through the exercise

that you have just done on health versus non-health benefits.

This exercise has two parts.

In the first part you considered the challenge

of estimating the health and non-health benefits of

a 24/7 piped water supply in a peri-urban

slum of a large city, from the household's perspective.

In the second part, you considered health and non-health benefits

to both connected and unconnected households, from a community perspective.

First, let's look at the household's perspective.

We assume a household is considering connecting to a new

piped water supply with 24/7 service in a peri-urban slum.

The household is thinking about the health and non-health benefits

it will receive if it connects to the new system.

But before the fact, or ex-ante, the household may not

perceive all the health and non-health benefits it will recieve ex-post.

Ex-ante there are benefits that the household perceives.

Then ex-post the household actually receives both

the perceived benefits and the non-perceived benefits.

We assume there are four types of benefits to the household.

These are shown in this table.

One, health benefits that the household perceives ex-ante that its

members will receive if it connects to the pipe distribution system.

Two, health benefits that the household does

not perceive ex-ante that its members will receive,

but, in fact, the household will receive ex-post

if it connects to the piped distribution system.

Three, non-health benefits that the household perceives ex-ante that its

member will receive if it connects to the piped distribution system.

And four, non-health benefits that the household does not perceive ex-ante, but,

in fact, will receive ex-post if it connects to the piped distribution system.

We assume that these four types of benefits to

the households sum to 100% of the household's benefits.

This table shows an example in which each of

the four types of benefits is equal in size.

That is, each represents 25% of the total benefits.

Your first task was to replace the 25% values in these

four cells with values that you think would be more accurate.

This table shows Dale's guesses, but he emphasizes that they are just a guess.

Dale thinks that health and non-health

benefits are typically roughly equal in size.

He's put them here as both totaling 50%.

Of course, the relative size will depend on local conditions.

If households are using vendors, then cost savings

from having a piped supply will be significant.

If households are walking to collect water from outside

the home, time savings are likely to be significant.

Both cost savings and time savings are non-health benefits.

Dale thinks that most, but not all, of

the benefits to households will be perceived ex-ante.

He estimates that 75% of the benefits will

be perceived ex-ante and 25% will not be perceived.

Of those benefits that are not perceived by the

household, Dale suspects most of these are health benefits.

The second part of the exercise was to consider the investment

in a 24/7 piped water system from the perspective of the community.

The water planner estimates that 50% of the households in the community

will connect to the new pipe system and 50% will not connect.

The connected households throw off externalities,

both positive and negative, on other households.

Both those who connect and those that do not connect.

At the community level benefits accrue to both connected and unconnected households.

Again, we look at health and non-health benefits.

Your task was to fill in the cells in this table.

As for the the previous table for the household's perspective, the

four cells in the northwest portion of the table total 100%.

This table shows Dale's estimates, but he

again emphasizes that these are just guesses.

Again, Dale estimates a 50/50 split between health and non-health benefits.

Dale thinks that most, about 80%, of

the benefits will accrue to connected households.

Most of the positive externalities would arise

from sanitation investments, not from the water supply.

He guesses that the benefits to unconnected households

would be split equally between health and non-health benefits.

We want to emphasize that no one knows the answer to the first or

the second part of this exercise, either for a particular community or in general.

This is a puzzling situation for wash professionals to find themselves in.

Without being able to answer such seemingly straightforward

questions it is easy to see why understanding

household's behavior is difficult, and why conducting an

economic analysis of such water infrastructure investments is challenging.

This exercise poses the question, how to proceed in the face of

such uncertainty about the magnitude and

distribution of the benefits from such investments?

Should we proceed based on intuition?

Or do we need a strategy for planning in the face of uncertainty?

If so, what should this strategy be?

Thanks for watching this video.

[BLANK_AUDIO]

探索我们的目录

免费加入并获得个性化推荐、更新和优惠。

Coursera 致力于普及全世界最好的教育，它与全球一流大学和机构合作提供在线课程。

© 2019 Coursera Inc. 保留所有权利。

通过 App Store 下载

通过 Google Play 获取

Coursera
关于
管理团队
工作机会
目录
证书
MasterTrack™ 证书
学位
企业版
政府版

社区
Learners
Partners
Developers
Beta Testers
Translators

连接
博客
Facebook
领英
Twitter
Instagram
YouTube
技术博客

更多
条款
隐私
帮助
内容访问
媒体
联系我们
目录
附属公司