Explore
For Enterprise
Join for Free
Log In

艺术与人文
商务
计算机科学
数据科学
信息技术
健康
数学和逻辑
个人发展
物理科学与工程
社会科学
语言学习
学位
证书

浏览 Coursera 的全部课程

浏览
搜索
企业版
登录
免费加入

Round table discussion: Reflection on the readings

Loading...

Writing your World: Finding yourself in the academic space

开普敦大学

4.8（48 个评分） | 4.9K 名学生已注册

Throughout the world, writing serves to express, record and even create meaningful moments. In academic spaces, writing becomes the bridge between ourselves and the world of ideas. In this course, we provide practical insights into how to write an academic essay. We show you how to develop the academic skills needed to be a competent academic writer. You will have an opportunity to engage with texts written by academics, and to see how some of the ideas in these texts are used by students in constructing an academic essay. We address some of the challenges these students face with respect to academic writing and offer you the opportunity to practice and to develop your own writing style. For this course, we centre our lessons around a specific topic - the concept of identity, since it forms such an important feature of how we locate ourselves in an ever-changing global world. In other words, this course teaches academic writing skills through getting you to write and reflect on your understanding of identity. So if you are thinking about studying at a tertiary institution, or if you just want to brush up on your academic essay writing skills, this course is for you!

查看授课大纲

审阅

4.8（48 个评分）

5 stars
41 ratings
4 stars
5 ratings
3 stars
2 ratings

MM

Jan 29, 2019

Its a really beneficial course for those who are aspiring to be a writer in future.

IK

Apr 29, 2018

a\n\nl\n\no\n\nt\n\nh\n\ne\n\nl\n\np\n\nf\n\nu\n\nl

从本节课中

Starting to finish: writing the first draft

This week we sum up the ground we have covered in this course. The week is about crafting your final essay draft. We recap the building blocks of writing an academic essay, relooking at the features of an introduction, body, conclusion and the purposes of cohesion, coherence and referencing. We also consider and provide engaged feedback on the draft essays written by our three virtual students. There is detailed feedback on the strengths, improvements and opportunities for further improvement on the essays. The feedback is aligned with the core skills introduced in the course, such as writing the topic sentence, linking sentences and ensuring coherence and cohesion. Thereafter we sum up the course with a discussion on the ideas of the four thinkers you were introduced to in this course, namely Woodward, Sichone, Blommaert and Thornton.

Looking back on the course2:07

Round table discussion: Reflection on the readings14:44

The essay building blocks5:36

Referencing and managing sources5:54

Giving feedback on Ziggy's draft7:40

Giving feedback on Joey's draft3:45

Giving feedback on Ada's draft3:32

Looking forward2:16

教学方

Gideon Nomdo
Lecturer
Aditi Hunma
Lecturer

脚本

[MUSIC]

Okay, welcome back.

This discussion is going to be a recap of the four

thinkers you've come across on this course.

So we've been introduced to Woodward, Thornton, Sichone, and Blommaert.

And I just thought we could sort of have a wrap up session,

just looking at what they've got in common and how they differ.

With Woodward, she brought up that in order for

sameness to exist, there needs an other or different.

So a Spanish speaking person identifies themselves with other Spanish

speaking people and as being different from say, a Mandarin speaking person.

So it is kind of paradox, the sameness and otherness.

>> Yes, she would argue that you cannot construct sameness without difference.

And what really stands out is when we construct sameness we

need to develop meaning around symbols and so she speaks about representations.

So how we represent something

becomes a symbol of what a particular group identity is or stands for.

And she grapples with the notion of identity in that identity is constantly

changing, so you'd move from a high school pupil to becoming a university student.

So you've left one identity behind, the identity of a high school pupil and

you've taken on this new identity as a university student.

And so the question which is often posed is, as we go through all these different

transitions, is there anything that remains constant?

And we would argue yes, you know, all aspects of the identity remain constant,

but at the same time there are all these changes happening as well.

And Woodward would simply say, if we're in a particular context,

we bring certain aspects of our identity to the fore, which makes a dynamic.

So identity is as much as about what's being said as what's not being said,

and I think there's a thing that really stands out in a reading is that

we don't get to validate our own identities.

The in group does that, people have to see through my practices, what I say and

how I perform, if I am who I say I am.

So others get to validate my identity for me.

>> And also, sometimes, we start shaping or

constructing our identity based on how others perceive us.

>> Exactly. >> In another reading she speaks about

someone going for a job interview and imagining from the outside

how she will be perceived when she goes into that interview.

How, so whether she should dress formally or informally, and

constructing her identity according to those perceptions.

But the symbols that you mentioned are very interesting because they echo what

Thornton would call cultural resources, yes?

>> Let's move on to Thornton.

>> So if you think of the passport, for example,

a passport signals to someone that so and so is a foreigner.

And so immediately people start engaging in a process of identity

construction of this is a foreigner and

therefore sometimes what people do is they make assumptions of foreigners as well.

And we saw this in the Sichone article.

Black South Africans made, not just black South Africans,

I think his article does point to the fact that

many people in South Africa have xenophobic ideas and sentiments.

And so what he shows then is that purely through looking at people's physical

features, people start constructing identities of foreigners in specific ways.

>> And what's quite nice about that,

if you look at the whole Woodward notion of identity construction,

Woodward would argue that when you meet someone for the first time,

the first thing that pops in your head is to look at the physical markers.

So we categorize things into these neat boxes and

the minute you don't fit into a box you become an anomaly.

And we are wondering what it is that we do with you.

So we constantly are in the process of trying to define and

to identify what it is that we are dealing with.

I think interesting question is this idea of trying to categorize or

classify people is it something that is specific to a certain group of people or

is it something that all human beings do?

I think what Thornton and

people like Woodward would argue that all human beings do this.

We all try to classify or categorize people.

So it's a way for us to >> Well it creates order in our lives.

>> Yeah, that's what they would argue.

But I think what's important here is the negative

effects of that classification process and

the negative effects of identity constructions that lead to discrimination.

>> So if you take the theory of identity construction as a theory right,

or as Thornton would argue that the borders are imagined, we create them.

But although they are imagined the consequences of that are real.

So if you look at the South African context, during apartheid,

where people were restricted from living in certain areas,

they only had access to certain jobs.

So although our emotional blackness and whiteness is thought to be imagined,

the consequences are very, very real in people's lives.

>> To add to your point on difference, that difference by itself may not

be a problem but it's the assumptions that we draw based on these differences.

And we are all different, we are all diverse, but the conclusions,

the inferences that we make on that basis and how that becomes a justification for

violence which is quite problematic.

>> Yeah, that interesting because when one categorizes certain things,

even in terms of racial groups, white, black, Indian,

colored, whatever, right, the categories itself isn't problematic.

It's the meanings we apply to those categories that become problematic,

because in the purse you see a hierarchy of values.

>> In the case of Blommaert, then, he's looking at letters that have been

written in parts of Africa and looking at how those letters travel.

And sometimes those letters don't travel well.

So, there is girl who writes a letter in English and In her country,

she would be perceived as being fluent in English, but when that letter travels,

she's perceived as not being literate because

her version of English is not perceived as being a prestigious version of English.

That by itself might not be problematic, but what's problematic is then

the conclusion one draws about her as being literate or not literate.

So, there are consequences

that come with these texts that we carry across the borders.

And we can also see maybe the physical body as a text so

even when the physical body travels across boundaries, across borders,

whether they are national borders or from, let's say, high school to university.

That has consequences on the person crossing the boundaries,

because they are meanings that are inscribed onto the body

themselves that may be viewed as acceptable in one context, but

not as acceptable in such >> So,

give an example >> Other context.

So for example, if you have

students belonging to a certain group that tattoo themselves,

in a certain context, that might be viewed as fashionable, and in, and trendy.

However, if they go into religious space,

those very tattoos would define them as deviants.

And therefore, they might not be as welcomed

in that religious space as they would be welcomed in a club or

somewhere were you have the youth engaging in such practices.

>> I think also in the way we get socialized,

sometimes we are socialized to believe that people from a certain

part of the world should look a certain way and should act a certain way.

And so we take those identity markers and

we start assigning them to people, right.

And so we might find we will have a torrid time sitting in an airport

using those cultural markers, using those identity markers,

to assign people in specific categories.

I think this is what Sichone highlights in his article.

It shows how South Africans attacked South Africans

during the xenophobic violence purely on looking at

markers that they assumed are associated with particular groups of people.

And this shows you how dangerous it is to engage in

identity constructions that kind of negative effects on people.

>> I just wanted to go back, I mean, with all four of these thinkers,

this concept of borders and boundaries comes up.

Thornton obviously speaks a lot to it, \but the others also.

>> Yeah, for Woodward much more obvious in terms of creating social boundaries, she

makes a distinction between personality and between identity, on the other end.

And she would argue that personality, or part of what's innate, our moods,

if we're shy, if we're outgoing, etc.

But she would argue that individuals also

have an element of choice when it comes to adopting particular types of identities.

Sometimes, those identities are forced upon us,

there are some aspects of identity we can't escape.

So If you were born with a white skin as opposed to a black skin,

when you cross that border, that white skin or

black skin has currency or lacks currency when you cross that border.

So that's something you can't escape.

But if you look at something like an accent, you know

a black South African student could easily learn how to speak like an American and

adopt an American accent.

And the minute you take on that accent, people's perception of your change.

because the accent allows for that, yeah.

>> And they have to rework that accent when they go back home.

>> Exactly. >> Because there are other norms

that are in place back home so

it's always a performance and performance on what's the script here.

>> Exactly, and that's what Woodward would argues, Woodward speaks about

the practices associated with identity in terms of performance, you know,

this script.

Society allows certain roles to be performed.

And so growing up in a particular society means

that you have to recognize the role which sort of suits you.

And so you adopt a script, right?

So where heterosexual marriages are the norm, right something like

a gay marriage would be frowned upon because it goes against the norm.

So in that way the structure then restricts one's sense of identity.

And it's quite important to think very carefully about

elements of choice when we close boundaries.

>> I mean I was just thinking let's just remind ourselves about the issue of

boundaries with Thornton. Moeain, do you want to?

>> Well I think Thornton's notion of boundaries is important

when you think of how we construct identities.

Thornton argues that boundaries are created,

they are imagined, they are not real.

So you think of the boundaries of race, class and gender,

we acquire these boundaries through a process of socialization.

And so obviously, because we acquire them,

we can also unlearn them and we can discard them as well.

We can construct and deconstruct, and we can re-imagine the world today.

>> I think for me, the issue of unlearning also makes

I mean within the South African context anyway,

makes us aware of how difficult it is to unlearn,

given the vast social economic inequalities.

And I think, well if you back on Sichone, what Sichone makes us aware

of constructing these boundaries is the extent to which social economic and

cultural factors impact this notion of unlearning.

And it does problematize it, if people had equal access to resources,

I don't think it would be as problematic as it is now.

I think what all the readings do quite well is to make us all aware of

our own capital.

The type of resources that we have and how those

resources come to be valued in some context, and devalued in other contexts.

And I think what other leading point to is the consequences of that valuing,

devaluing process that happens.

because the consequences are real, though the boundaries are imagined,

the consequences are real.

So, as our context, students moving from one continent,

even from a different continent altogether into this continent, they need to be

cognizant of their own resources and how those resources are going to be navigated,

negotiated, in the different contexts.

And it's about value, how can I add value to the context I'm in, and

what can I learn from the different contacts that I enter in,

in terms of enriching my own cultural repertoire so to speak.

>> Okay so we hope that this wrap up discussion will help inform

your draft writing process.

And it's time for us to say goodbye and wish you well with your final draft.

[MUSIC]

探索我们的目录

免费加入并获得个性化推荐、更新和优惠。

Coursera 致力于普及全世界最好的教育，它与全球一流大学和机构合作提供在线课程。

© 2019 Coursera Inc. 保留所有权利。

通过 App Store 下载

通过 Google Play 获取

Coursera
关于
管理团队
工作机会
目录
证书
MasterTrack™ 证书
学位
企业版
政府版

社区
Learners
Partners
Developers
Beta Testers
Translators

连接
博客
Facebook
领英
Twitter
Instagram
YouTube
技术博客

更多
条款
隐私
帮助
内容访问
媒体
联系我们
目录
附属公司