课程概述
热门审阅
The course was a concise and effective review of major concepts. The concepts were well explained and the lessons practical. I have a better understanding of fatigue failure as a result of this class.
Thank you so much. I liked your teaching style.You gave me a clear understanding about each and every topic covered in this course.I enjoyed the learning.Hope we will be in touch for further courses.
426 - Machine Design Part I 的 450 个评论（共 455 个）
创建者 Juan P G
•It has been very useful to recall this knowledge.
创建者 TUSHAR C
•Its a very good course , a lot of things to learn
创建者 Aditya R
•more example problems would have helped
创建者 Jacob.shi
•good class，beautiful teacher
创建者 Divyanshu K
•very informative but hard
创建者 Priyanka F P
•A good technical course!
创建者 shyam m s
•good explain skill
创建者 Muhammad H
•Extraordinary
创建者 Rohith
•madam part-ii
创建者 K S K
•Nice Session
创建者 Tejas
•Thank you !!
创建者 SHARUKH A
•Great
创建者 Deleted A
•Good
创建者 Gokul
•Good
创建者 Jaydeep C
•good
创建者 Sharukhan
•good
创建者 Zhao Z
•I love the example of Boeing and the cool video of real-world stress test. The course hour should be set higher than 11 hr, as much time is needed for self-study. Also some calculation rounds off at early stage and lead to a very different answer.
创建者 Eric H
•Material somewhat simplistic and professor likes to "hold your hand" rather than exposing the material and letting the student run with it.
创建者 BHUSHAN D
•Problems are not explained in depth. There were minor errors. Some points in slides were just skipped or explained with out any examples
创建者 Sumeet M
•Very good course but if you give at least 2 attempts in 24 hours then it would be more interesting in submitting the quiz
创建者 siva k g
•Very good 👍 subject to Mechanical engineering...we know everything
About to material
创建者 Mohamed A E A E E
•there is lack of information , i wish it can give more information about the field
创建者 Pouria P
•the course was good but the time between 2 exams was too long, 24 h!
创建者 Thomas G
•Although the course content is good, it is riddled with simple errors. The teacher often uses the wrong terms for things which makes it difficult to follow. It also has very little to do with machine design, other than using a shaft as an example to calculate stresses, and should be renamed mechanics of materials.
创建者 Колпаков Е А
•There's much to be desired. Sad that the videos still have remarks. By the was there's no feedback from the teacher only from forum. It might written that you don't need any additional knowlege, but it will happen that explanation won't be engouh. A very poor quality
Coursera Footer
