关于此课程： Discover the principles of solid scientific methods in the behavioral and social sciences. Join us and learn to separate sloppy science from solid research! This course will cover the fundamental principles of science, some history and philosophy of science, research designs, measurement, sampling and ethics. The course is comparable to a university level introductory course on quantitative research methods in the social sciences, but has a strong focus on research integrity. We will use examples from sociology, political sciences, educational sciences, communication sciences and psychology.
制作方： 阿姆斯特丹大学
教学方： Annemarie Zand Scholten, Assistant Professor
Economics and Business
| 基本信息 | 课程 1（共 5 门，社会科学的方法和统计 Specialization ） |
| 承诺学习时间 | 8 weeks, 4-5 hours/week |
| 语言 | English, 字幕： Chinese (Simplified) |
| 如何通过 | 通过所有计分作业以完成课程。 |
| 用户评分 |
授课大纲
第 1 周
Before we get started...
In this first module we'll consider the basic principles of the scientific method, its history and its philosophies. But before we start talking methods, I'll give you a broad sense of what the course is about and how it's organized. Are you new to Coursera or still deciding whether this is the course for you? Then make sure to check out the 'Introduction' and 'What to expect' section below, so you'll have the essential information you need to decide and to do well in this course! If you have any questions about the course format, deadlines or grading, you'll probably find the answers here. Are you a Coursera veteran and anxious to get started? Then you might want to skip ahead to the first course topic: the Origins of the Scientific Method. You can always check the general information later. Veterans and newbies alike: Don't forget to introduce yourself in the 'meet and greet' forum!
2 视频, 9 阅读材料
- Reading: Hi there!
- 视频: Undecided? See why you should join!
- 视频: Welcome to quantitative methods!
- Reading: How to navigate this course
- Reading: How to contribute
- Reading: General info - What will I learn in this course?
- Reading: Course format - How is this course structured?
- Reading: Requirements - What resources do I need?
- Reading: Grading - How do I pass this course?
- Reading: Contact - How do I stay informed?
- Reading: Team - Who created this course?
Origins of the scientific method
Science is all about gaining knowledge, coming up with the best possible explanations of the world around us. So how do we decide which explanation is the best one? How do we make sure our explanations are accurate?
How do we determine we actually know something? In science we try to resolve these questions by using a set of principles and procedures called the scientific method. You need to know its historical and philosophical 'origin story' to really understand the scientific method and to fully appreciate how hard it is to apply the scientific method in the social and behavioral sciences!
14 视频, 9 阅读材料, 1 练习测试
- Reading: What makes knowledge scientific?
- 视频: 1.01 Non-scientific Methods
- Reading: What are the essential qualities of a systematic method?
- 视频: 1.02 Scientific Method
- Reading: What's the difference between a hypothesis and a theory?
- 视频: 1.03 Scientific Claims
- Reading: Who developed the scientific method and when?
- 视频: 1.04 Classical Period
- 视频: 1.05 Enlightenment
- 视频: 1.06 Modern Science
- Reading: What is your philosophy of science?
- 视频: 1.07 Epistemology
- Reading: Do you prefer your science hard or soft?
- 视频: 1.08 Ontology
- 视频: 1.09 Approaches
- 视频: 1.10 Goals
- Reading: Honor Code - Integrity in this course
- Practice Quiz: Origins
- Peer Review: Origins - OPTIONAL Writing Assignment (Evaluative)
- Reading: Transcripts: Origins
- Reading: About the interview
- 视频: Origins - Interview - Gerben Moerman (Part 1 of 4)
- 视频: Origins - Interview - Gerben Moerman (Part 2 of 4)
- 视频: Origins - Interview - Gerben Moerman (Part 3 of 4)
- 视频: Origins - Interview - Gerben Moerman (Part 4 of 4)
第 2 周
The Scientific Method
In the first module we discussed how the scientific method developed, general philosophical approaches and the types of knowledge science aims to find. In this second module we'll make these abstract principles and concepts a little more concrete by discussing the empirical cycle and causality in more detail. We’ll see how, and in what order these concepts are implemented when we conduct a research study. We'll also consider the main criteria for evaluating the methodological quality of a research study: Validity and reliability. The focus will be on internal validity and how internal validity can be threatened.
13 视频, 8 阅读材料, 1 练习测试
- Reading: What would be your 'recipe' for the scientific method?
- 视频: 2.01 Empirical Cycle
- Reading: What will it take for you to accept a hypothesis?
- 视频: 2.02 (Dis)confirmation
- Reading: What do you look for in a good research study?
- 视频: 2.03 Criteria
- Reading: How do you identify what caused an effect?
- 视频: 2.04 Causality
- Reading: What makes a causal explanation less likely?
- 视频: 2.05 Internal Validity Threats: Participants
- 视频: 2.06 Internal Validity Threats: Instruments
- 视频: 2.07 Internal Validity Threats: Artificiality
- 视频: 2.08 Internal Validity Threats: Research setup
- Reading: What different relations and roles can variables have?
- 视频: 2.09 Variables of Interest
- 视频: 2.10 Variables of Disinterest
- Practice Quiz: Informed Consent Form
- Reading: Transcripts: Scientific Method
- Reading: About the interview
- 视频: Scientific Method - Interview - Marjan Bakker (Part 1 of 3)
- 视频: Scientific Method - Interview - Marjan Bakker (Part 2 of 3)
- 视频: Scientific Method - Interview - Marjan Bakker (Part 3 of 3)
已评分: Scientific Method
已评分: Scientific Method - Writing Assignment (Creative)
第 3 周
Research Designs
In the previous module we discussed the empirical cycle, causality and the criteria for methodological quality, focusing on threats to internal validity. In this module we'll consider the most frequently used research designs and we'll see how they address threats to internal validity. We'll look at experimental, quasi-experimental and correlational designs, as well as some other designs you should be familiar with. To understand and appreciate these designs we will discuss some general concepts such as randomization and matching in a little more detail.
15 视频, 8 阅读材料
- Reading: What are the essential features of a true experiment?
- 视频: 3.01 True Experiments
- Reading: What are other ways of comparing?
- 视频: 3.02 Factorial Designs
- 视频: 3.03 Repeated Measures
- Reading: How do manipulation and control work (in the lab vs the field)?
- 视频: 3.04 Manipulation
- 视频: 3.05 Lab vs. Field
- 视频: 3.06 Randomization
- Reading: What experimental designs can you think of?
- 视频: 3.07 Experimental Designs
- Reading: What if you cannot assign randomly?
- 视频: 3.08 Matching
- 视频: 3.09 Quasi-Experimental Designs
- Reading: What if you can't manipulate either?
- 视频: 3.10 Correlational Designs
- 视频: 3.11 Other Designs
- Reading: Transcripts: Research Designs
- Reading: About the interview
- 视频: Research Designs - Interview - Maarten Bos (Part 1 of 4)
- 视频: Research Designs - Interview - Maarten Bos (Part 2 of 4)
- 视频: Research Designs - Interview - Maarten Bos (Part 3 of 4)
- 视频: Research Designs - Interview - Maarten Bos (Part 4 of 4)
已评分: Research Designs
已评分: Research Designs - Writing Assignment (Evaluative)
第 4 周
Measurement
Choosing a design is only the first step in the deduction phase (remember the empirical cycle?). The second step is deciding on specific ways to measure the variables of interest and disinterest.
This step is extremely important, because even if we are able to perform a true double-blind experiment, if our measurement and manipulation method are of poor quality, then internal validity will still be compromised!
In this module we'll look at what measurement is exactly and what the criteria for evaluating measurement are. We will also look more in-depth at self-report measures, including survey, questionnaires and tests. These methods are among the most frequently used measurement instruments in the social and behavioral sciences.
14 视频, 6 阅读材料
- Reading: How do you measure something?
- 视频: 4.01 Operationalization
- Reading: What is measurement exactly?
- 视频: 4.02 Measurement Structure
- 视频: 4.03 Measurement Levels
- 视频: 4.04 Variable Types
- Reading: How do you know whether you have used the right instrument?
- 视频: 4.05 Measurement Validity
- 视频: 4.06 Measurement Reliability
- Reading: How are measures constructed and what are their features?
- 视频: 4.07 Survey, Questionnaire, Test
- 视频: 4.08 Scales and Response Options
- 视频: 4.09 Response and Rater Bias
- 视频: 4.10 Other Measurement Types
- Reading: Transcripts: Measurement
- Reading: About the interview
- 视频: Measurement - Interview - Andries van der Ark (Part 1 of 4)
- 视频: Measurement - Interview - Andries van der Ark (Part 2 of 4)
- 视频: Measurement - Interview - Andries van der Ark (Part 3 of 4)
- 视频: Measurement - Interview - Andries van der Ark (Part 4 of 4)
已评分: Measurement
已评分: Measurement - Writing Assignment (Creative)
第 5 周
Sampling
In the previous two modules we discussed research designs and methods to measure and manipulate our variables of interest and disinterest. Before a researcher can move on to the testing phase and can actually collect data, there is just one more procedure that needs to be decided on: Sampling. Researchers need to determine who potential participants are and how they will be selected and recruited.
13 视频, 7 阅读材料
- Reading: How are samples used for generalization?
- 视频: 5.01 External Validity Threats
- 视频: 5.02 Sampling Concepts
- Reading: Why would you use probability sampling?
- 视频: 5.03 Probability Sampling
- 视频: 5.04 Probability Sampling - Simple
- 视频: 5.05 Probability Sampling - Complex
- Reading: Why would you use non-probability sampling?
- 视频: 5.06 Non-Probability Sampling
- Reading: To what extent does a sample reflect the population?
- 视频: 5.07 Sampling Error
- 视频: 5.08 Non-Sampling Error
- Reading: How large should your sample be?
- 视频: 5.09 Sample Size
- Reading: Transcripts: Sampling
- Reading: About the interview
- 视频: Sampling - Interview - Armén Hakhverdian (Part 1 of 4)
- 视频: Sampling - Interview - Armén Hakhverdian (Part 2 of 4)
- 视频: Sampling - Interview - Armén Hakhverdian (Part 3 of 4)
- 视频: Sampling - Interview - Armén Hakhverdian (Part 4 of 4)
已评分: Sampling
已评分: Sampling - Writing assignment (Evaluative)
第 6 周
Practice, Ethics & Integrity
In this last content module we will focus on the part of the research process that follows data collection. The specifics of storing data and using statistics form a course topic in their own right (see the specialization courses on Basic and Inferential Statistics). For now we will focus on more general issues to do with data, interpretation and dissemination of results that relate to ethics and integrity. Some of the concepts that we discuss here will be familiar if you watched the interviews of the past modules. It might be interesting to (re-)watch these if you have the time!
13 视频, 6 阅读材料
- Reading: How would you manage and store your data?
- 视频: 6.01 Documentation
- 视频: 6.02 Data Management
- Reading: How do we make sure participants are treated ethically?
- 视频: 6.03 Unethical Studies
- 视频: 6.04 Ethics Towards Participants
- Reading: How do we make sure researchers behave ethically and with integrity?
- 视频: 6.05 Research Integrity
- 视频: 6.06 Questionable Research Practices
- Reading: What about ethics in the publication process?
- 视频: 6.07 Peer Review Process
- 视频: 6.08 Dissemination Problems
- Peer Review: Practice, Ethics & Integrity - OPTIONAL Writing assignment (Evaluative)
- 视频: 6.extra Milgram's Obedience Study (see OPTIONAL assignment)
- Reading: Transcripts: Practice, Ethics & Integrity
- Reading: About the interview
- 视频: Interview - Practice, Ethics & Integrity - Jelte Wicherts (Part 1 of 4)
- 视频: Interview - Practice, Ethics & Integrity - Jelte Wicherts (Part 2 of 4)
- 视频: Interview - Practice, Ethics & Integrity - Jelte Wicherts (Part 3 of 4)
- 视频: Interview - Practice, Ethics & Integrity - Jelte Wicherts (Part 4 of 4)
已评分: Practice, Ethics & Integrity
已评分: Practice, Ethics & Integrity - Writing assignment (Creative)
第 7 周
Catch Up
In this module there's no new material to study. The only requirement in this module is that you finish up the final peer review assignment. We also advise you to take some extra time to review the material from the previous modules and to practice for the final exam. We've provided two practice exams that you can take as many times as you like. In the first one, feedback for each answer will be provided right after taking the test. We've also created some screencast videos that explain the right answers to the second practice exam in more detail.
3 视频, 1 阅读材料, 2 练习测试
- Practice Quiz: Practice Exam 1 - immediate feedback
- Practice Quiz: Practice Exam 2 - feedback in screencasts
- 视频: Screencast Practice Exam 2 - Questions 1-10
- 视频: Screencast Practice Exam 2 - Questions 11-20
- 视频: Screencast Practice Exam 2 - Questions 21-30
- Reading: Transcripts: All modules
已评分: Final Writing Assignment - (Evaluative)
第 8 周
Exam Time!
This is the final module, where you can apply everything you've learned until now in the final exam. The final exam is structured exactly like the practice exam, so you know what to expect. Please note that you can only take the final exam once a month, so make sure you are fully prepared to take the test. Please follow the honor code and do not communicate or confer with others taking this exam. Good luck! Once you've taken the exam why not check out the bonus material - a series of presentations on research integrity in the social sciences, presented at a special symposium at the University of Amsterdam in 2014.
1 阅读材料
- Reading: Bonus material - presentations on research integrity
已评分: Final Exam
常见问题解答
运作方式
Coursework
Each course is like an interactive textbook, featuring pre-recorded videos, quizzes and projects.
Help from Your Peers
Connect with thousands of other learners and debate ideas, discuss course material, and get help mastering concepts.
Certificates
Earn official recognition for your work, and share your success with friends, colleagues, and employers.
制作方
阿姆斯特丹大学
A modern university with a rich history, the University of Amsterdam
(UvA) traces its roots back to 1632, when the Golden Age school Athenaeum
Illustre was established to train students in trade and philosophy. Today,
with more than 30,000 students, 5,000 staff and 285 study programmes
(Bachelor's and Master's), many of which are taught in English, and a
budget of more than 600 million euros, it is one of the largest
comprehensive universities in Europe. It is a member of the League of
European Research Universities and also maintains intensive contact with
other leading research universities around the world.
价格
| 购买课程 | |
|---|---|
| 访问课程材料 | 可用 |
| 访问评分的材料 | 可用 |
| 收到最终成绩 | 可用 |
| 获得可共享的课程证书 | 可用 |
评分和审阅
Incredible course!
Very interesting course! Explanations were clear. The course is well structured. It helped me a lot to organize the concepts that I already had about research methods. I stayed motivated all the course period. The choice of the quizzes were also very successful (QCM- creative and evaluative). Thank you!
I found the course very interesting, even very complex in some topics, but that was really constructive too. The course have excellent resources and explanations, I learned a lot.
RS
I very much liked the content of the course, the pace was nicely pitched, and the videos really well done. I also liked that I could print the script for each module, that made it a lot easier to revise. And I also found the practice exam really useful where the course convener explained the answers in separate videos.
I think it would be really helpful if similar videos could exist for each of the written assignments. The feedback we receive from peers is usually limited to a couple of words (e.g. 'well done') and does not really help you assess how well you did. Having someone who teaches the course provide sample answers or discussion videos for each written assignment would add a lot of value and aid students' learning.