This is wonderful course especially for research scholars, one suggestion is instead of giving articles from books, please provide a PPT which will be more effective ! thank you for wonderful session.
A well made lesson with focus of what matters the most in research. The university of London along with Coursera did a great job at pointing out how research topics should be approached.\n\nThank you
创建者 Yash Y A•
The course is very simplified version of Research Methodology. In my opinion it would have been better if the course contained actual lectures rather than mere interviews and talks. Apart from that the assignments are lack-luster and provides no incentives to someone who actually put in time and effort into reading material. Peer community for the most part seems average at best.
创建者 Enrico P•
Pretty shallow content, not really going in depth on anything. Parts of videos are repeated multiple times for no apparent reason. Errors in the wording of weekly tasks has existed seemingly for years and no effort has been put in solving the issues. I have paid for a certificate and earned it, and I do not think I am going to even download it.
创建者 Juan C V G•
Podria tener un enfoque mas amplio. Ya que solo se centra en investigacion en el are social. No abarca investigacion cientifica o de otrras ramas del cobnocimiento. Pudieron convocar expertos en estas areas para asie rniquecer en gran medida el proceso de aprendizaje, y hacer de este un curso mas global.
创建者 Gunnar W•
Could be made much more interactive, interesting and challenging. It raises four important topics and the methodology is interesting, but the evaluation for students is so relaxed it does not invite engagement or further ellaboration.
创建者 Nidhi R•
This course relies heavily on self-reading and theoretical knowledge. Video interviews which are part of the curriculum are mostly not useful. Overall the course did not provide me with the value I was looking for.
Overall, the e-tivities or tasks given are good. However, the videos and courses don't add a lot of contribution to what is known. It is very basic and very less inputs are provided during the course.
创建者 Abhishekkumar T•
This course just gives you theoretical background of research methods and too easy. I found it actually not useful to me. I learned no practical skills to deal with my research thesis.
创建者 Zebun N A•
The content of the course was very minimal. Much needs to be put into such a course to inspire research attitudes - and probably more outputs should be demanded from the learners too.
创建者 Katharhy G•
I expected more instruction of getting a research project started. The course was mainly to introduce different aspects of general ideas of why research is a good idea.
创建者 Sayr E O O•
The sound is not clear, they bore me a lot when they talk about something. I would enjoy the course if they type it in a page to read it more comfortably.
创建者 Christopher M S•
There was very little actual content in this course, and I can't say I learned very much. In hindsight, I wish I hadn't paid for a verified certificate.
创建者 Ahmed E•
This is a good course but I was hoping to get lectures that teach the research methodology in greater details with MCQs as testing methods.
创建者 Akshay T•
Not at all recommended. I would prefer rather book like Craft of research or a similar one instead of this course.
创建者 Oosman B•
Contains worthwhile content though for all the hours spent, I didn't get as much as I should have.
创建者 Abdulrahman A•
The course is not well constricted to guide students.. it's only fill the gaps.
创建者 Rawan N A•
thank you for your efforts but I think need more information
创建者 Biobele L•
It was a great and enlightening course. I was so excited
创建者 Carlos M C C•
Poor sound, low quality videos. Low engagement.
创建者 Saquib B H•
The contents could have been better.
创建者 Rawan I B H•
Not adding any valuable information
创建者 Sintra S•
Not really detailed
创建者 Xavier O•
创建者 david w•
Peer reviewing quality was very poor, and I didn't receive any feedback that I could learn from. There was a mismatch between the simplicity of the points in the videos and the complexity of the readings, and there was no assistance with the reading, e.g. supporting notes or videos discussing the readings. The discussion facility was not used for any actual discussion of the material, but was filled with requests for peer reviewing including at least one that said 'I'll give you a good mark if you give me one'.
The useful aspect was completing the assignments, which made me watch the videos and read the sources, but, as I say, there was no subsequent useful feedback.
创建者 aastha s•
This course is not what it boasts to be.Just some random interviews are posted without doing any work on developing the content and structuring the presentation.Pier review system even makes it worse.I was expecting a more structured presentation rather than beating around the bush.Rather than giving reference to the materials you can make some efforts to create content of your own.If you are looking for course on research methods the course by university of Amsterdam is the best hands down.
创建者 Zafar A•
The course could be done much better. It is basically people being interviewed about what research is and they ask the same questions to 4 different people with similar answers. Also the course organisers get u the paying customer to review as oppose to do it themselves -I think this is not fair and u get no input from the course organiser. How this course got an award is beyond me. Coursea should remove this course or get new people to do it properly.