excellent course , and this course really enhance my knowledge and give me new area for deeply study of cobots . I thank full to all professors and his team . regards
It was an excellent knowledge gathering exercise. The course was well structured and there is good level of guidance for learning and implementation in the course.
创建者 chanakya j•
very good and useful content
创建者 siddharth a m R•
创建者 CHANDRASHEKAR G V•
创建者 Don W•
This is an interesting, informative course on a very specific subject. It gives a very good overview of the use of robots which interact in the same areas as people. However, the course appears to be orphaned. The forums point out a few dead links and exam question errors, but no one from the course has responded in over a year.
创建者 Ankit S•
The course was okay.
The instructor was good.
though, i expected to learn some programming for safety parameters which were not at all covered in this course. This is an improvement that i would suggest.
创建者 SARAANSH S•
Basic course for developing your knowledge about collaborative robots. Hazards related to it and some mitigation methods.
创建者 M.R N D•
创建者 Jessica N•
The transcripts for the videos are clearly not reviewed and include word substitution errors that could possibly be made by software or by someone who has English as a second language and erroneously selected a similar-sounding word. In some cases, you can figure out what is trying to be conveyed, but in other cases it's pretty confusing. Some of the additional resources are just advertisements from companies trying to sell their robots. Some of the additional resources links don't work. Some of the questions in the quizzes make no sense, partly because of incorrect word substitutions. Other issues include a yes/no question in week 4 where the "yes" answer and the "no" answer each provided an explanation after either the yes or the no... but the yes and the no were attached to the wrong explanations, thus causing the answers to be illogical and false. Another question asks about an arm being pinned by a robot, but the answer it wants is the answer for the user's palm being pinned. The palm is mentioned in the question, but the arm is the part the question says is pinned- so the answer the test wants is not the answer the question asks. The video in week 4 is terrible, and doesn't really effectively answer the question associated with it.