Almost all video are entirely based on the course notes, but some extra examples make the worth watching. I learned a lot of concepts about OOD thanks to the easy and clear explanations in the course notes. I really disliked the android stuff, was really hard to complete the capstone projects.

Lessons give a large overview, but not enough information for completing the practical activities. Also the reading material does not have sufficient information on it. Concepts are presented individually, often without any comprehensive examples for practical use.

The course content is good. The presenter is good,too.

But the discussion forums need monitoring from the staff, as there were many questions with no answers. Some of these questions are crucial for student's understanding of the material.

you should update the content of the course, it's using old android and it will be better if you just use java as the prerequisite for the course is java not android and xml and all the distracting stuff

good material to refresh OOD but I think the Android project to practice its a bit too much and not sure if you really show that you understand design patterns.

Purely peer reviewed grades, solutions don't always match lecture instructions.

Not really ideal for learning OOP fundamentals when Android studio is involved.

The material is good but the assignments are poorly created...

Lectures were information light, excercises where ok

The Android exercises were far off topic.

good

,

Too oriented towards Java, peer graded assigments are too many. Given code doesn't work easily for someone who has not experience with Android Studio.

ok

dull, it's better to have presenter who knows what he/she is talking about.