Chevron Left
返回到 Agile Meets Design Thinking

学生对 弗吉尼亚大学 提供的 Agile Meets Design Thinking 的评价和反馈

4.7
2,930 个评分
845 条评论

课程概述

Despite everyone's good intentions, hard work and solid ideas, too many teams end up creating products that no one wants, no one can use, and no one buys. But it doesn't have to be this way. Agile and design thinking offer a different--and effective--approach to product development, one that results in valuable solutions to meaningful problems. In this course, you’ll learn how to determine what's valuable to a user early in the process--to frontload value--by focusing your team on testable narratives about the user and creating a strong shared perspective. This course is supported by the Batten Institute at UVA’s Darden School of Business. The Batten Institute’s mission is to improve the world through entrepreneurship and innovation: www.batteninstitute.org....

热门审阅

AA
Sep 8, 2020

I absolutely recommend this course for everyone who really wants to develop their skill or want to learn new skills. this amazing course will assist you to understand the user in a more strategic way.

TD
Oct 23, 2017

Rich and well-structured content about Agile and Design Thinking, shows how to approach and include personas that will somehow be touched by the solution being created, and deliver outcomes to them.

筛选依据:

826 - Agile Meets Design Thinking 的 836 个评论(共 836 个)

创建者 Rawan R

Dec 9, 2018

I take effort to understand the and keep in track with the instructor, but it's a good content

创建者 Suttirat H

Sep 4, 2020

the course for product management from Darden was so much better

创建者 Roger K C J

Sep 16, 2020

There could be more content included and tested.

创建者 Federico F C

Jun 23, 2020

just an introduction

创建者 Harold J

Mar 7, 2016

Underway

创建者 NGUESSAN A

Oct 4, 2020

no

创建者 Colin E

Aug 4, 2020

The delivery is a little dry and there's clearly been some editing and rearranging of content. More than once, the instructor refers "back" to material that has not yet been presented. It's confusing and I ended up wasting time reviewing content because I thought I had missed it. Instead, it was just missing. or got a presenter much later in the course. There's a lot of repetition of concepts that seems pointless and the interviews don't really add to the understanding of the key points. The instructor also keeps referring to there being 5 courses in this specialty when there are 4.

创建者 John P

Jul 17, 2020

Poor instruction methods. The faculty lacks teaching and pedagogical skills. Sorry

创建者 Avraham H

Sep 15, 2020

too slow, assignments are irrelevant.

创建者 PRAKRUTHI S

Jun 20, 2020

I need to unenroll the course

创建者 Paulo M M

Jun 4, 2017

the evaluation is a shit.