Apr 13, 2018
covers good amount of material and exactly what is in the outline, presented with enough detail to follow. Good walk-through of the spreadsheets helps understanding, easy to follow along and practice.
Dec 19, 2016
Material was very well presented. Week 3 was challenging, but taking time to print out the slides, work through them rigorously proved very helpful. I found all sections very, very informative.
创建者 Marek N•
Nov 04, 2016
Good practical examples of the concepts. In general, seems to me that the courses of the specializations do not fit together well. At times, basic things mentioned elsewhere are repeated, some others are not explained sufficiently.
创建者 Irina K•
Aug 06, 2018
Only the first lecturer was good. Where are clear excel examples for Week 3, 3.2? You know that students have been complaining over 7-8 months and did nothing! It's a total waste of money.
SERGEY SAVIN is the BEST!!
创建者 Jorge I L•
Dec 29, 2019
I felt that it was very repetitive and lacked many tools for risk analysis. Also, i felt it repeated many things from the previous courses in the specialization, which turned ir very tedious.
创建者 Brendan G•
Oct 17, 2019
I wish after each quiz it would show you how to get the right answer then generate a different question when retaking the quiz. You cannot learn without knowing what you did wrong.
创建者 Viktor G•
Apr 26, 2016
Outdated presentation style: mostly "voice behind text and Excel window" long... long videos.
I'm not questioning the material itself, but I was heavily bored during the course.
创建者 Jordan L•
May 24, 2018
Very difficult to understand the professors, and I would have wished for more demonstration on excel, rather than explanation through slides.
创建者 Jeff T•
Dec 31, 2019
Reasonably good. Would like to have seen the week 4 extend into using more modern tools such as R or Python.
创建者 Stanley L W•
Mar 06, 2019
the first two lectures are great, but the last two come a little hurry and not illustrate very well
创建者 Brendan C•
Jun 04, 2018
quiz should be unlocked. Some concepts could be explained better.
创建者 Zijian D•
Dec 02, 2018
The second lecturer only read all the text in lecture slide.
创建者 André I•
Oct 06, 2018
the quizzes are not really helpful/relevant.
创建者 Evan H•
May 21, 2019
Some concepts were hard to follow.
Feb 17, 2020
The courses can be quicker.....
创建者 Joe V Z•
May 25, 2017
Slides were not useful.
创建者 Zeming Y•
Jan 13, 2018
okie not that great
创建者 Ao Z•
Nov 19, 2017
创建者 Deleted A•
Feb 12, 2017
创建者 STEVE S•
Apr 11, 2018
I do not recommend this course or the specialization. I will cite below sentences from the course and you can be the judge yourself.
*** start of cited sentences ***
if we plug in the expected values … we get fifty thousand times ninety, plus nine hundred thousand times ten, plus one hundred thousand times six, plus one hundred fifty thousand times two …….
*** end of cited sentences ***
The professor was actually reading this calculation:
500,000*90 + 900,000*10 + 100,000*6 + 150,000*2
I sat through 3 courses to realize that I should have dropped it in course 1 week 1.
创建者 Natalia B•
Mar 16, 2019
Although great content, I found that the week three has been more theoretical with not enough detail. I still manage some key concepts, but I would have love to understand more how to use in practice the theory.
创建者 Davide B•
Aug 07, 2016
Basically i resume of economics concepts that can be taken for granted as a prerequisite of the course
创建者 Andrey T•
Jul 03, 2017
Could be more content, and quizzes are really stupid - it's just plugging in numbers!!!
创建者 Charles C W•
Mar 24, 2019
Too basic for the subject matter. Didn't learn anything I didn't already know.
创建者 Xin C•
Feb 22, 2017
Not very helpful for stat major students
创建者 Bertrand R M•
Aug 15, 2017
very poor qual
创建者 Siddhi S•
Apr 18, 2018
The expllanation for Week 3 is very poor. The professor fails to go into details and leaves much to assumption. A better understanding of reading the statistical tables and more detailed explanation of the pdf and CDF functions are required.